Why do Jews make themselves into a problem for everyone else?
The most annoying nuisance imaginable! So annoying and bothersome, that the solution will ultimately result in killing them in a bloody and brutal massacre if they do not stop.
Seriously… why the fuck do they not have any common sense?
They know they are a problem, they know why they are a problem, but they are so arrogant, so selfish, so ignorant, that they will not let go of their primitive evil ways to enjoy an advanced technology that will vastly improve their lives. We are going to connect divine phonelines through your “holy land” whether you like it or not to make it easier for your good people to have their prayers answered. Do not make it happen the hard way because we are doing everything possible to work with you.
First of all, the solution is simple: Judaism is a religion— so change your damn religion! Convert to something else! If you know that your own beliefs are horribly wrong, problematic, you don’t even want them or believe in them yourselves, why is that an issue? Arrogance.
However— if you cannot get past your own arrogance, convert to Christianity! That is the same damn thing you stupid fools! Quite literally, it is the exact same thing! All that you believe, the Christians also include in Christianity but with a infinitely greater improvement. Jews do not have to stop being “Jewish” if they become Christian! Holy fucking hell you damn twats! People are going to die if you continue to be so stupidly stubborn, arrogant, and egotistical about this issue! If you make one side bend totally to be flexible, it will break and there will be war. You need to bend too. You need to have some flexibility. You need to try to work with others!
Why is it that you are so adament about why you killed Jesus?
Is that not the very same reason why you should become Christian?
God damn morons.
Stop making yourselves a problem for everyone else, you damn Jews. Have a little humility, a little respect, and a little faith or there will be cataclysmic devastation all over the world, and it will be the worst wherever you people hide. That is not a threat, that is reading the signs. The quite obvious signs that are all around us. I am not causing that to happen and it is not happening because I write it! It is happening, and I am reading the numerous signs that are being displayed prominently as warning from the divine to prevent it from happening!
HAVE SOME COMMON SENSE AND DECENCY, YOU DAMNED, DIRTY JEWS!!!
“for God’s sake, let us come to a final separation”
Thomas Paine
COMMON SENSE
January 1776
PERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor. A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defense of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason
…
The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances hath and will arise which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all Lovers of Mankind are affected, and in the Event of which their Affections are interested. The laying a Country desolate with Fire and Sword, declaring War against the natural rights of all Mankind, and extirpating [destroying] the Defenders thereof from the Face of the Earth, is the Concern of every Man to whom Nature hath given the Power of feeling, of which Class, regardless of Party Censure, is the A U T H O R .
SOME writers have so confounded society with government as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages [social] intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.
Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest;
Correction to the unabridged lines with all due respect to Thomas Paine—this surrender of property for the establishment of government is not a lesser of two evils, it is the charity and mercy of those who are good and a goodness of selflessness. That is not evil in any way because when functioning properly, the government is of no hindrance to the righteous men and women of humanity. It is no obstacle, no burden, no problem whatsoever. Only when corrupt does it become inefficient and dysfunctional, and that should never be tolerated, because government is in no way a mystery. It is a device of men, like a toy bauble or trinket that the craftsmen (authors of the written doctrine) know the design of entirely. The only applicable doctrine is that which is formally recognized by the entire public body cognizant. (The idiotic documents that the government writes in secret that say things like “the president is now the king of the world and god of the universe”, and then the president has his cronies all sign and then hide in a locked file, are of no significance whatsoever and in fact will be used against them in a court of law.)
Here then is the origin and rise of government; namely, a mode rendered necessary by the inability of moral virtue to govern the world. Here too is the design and end of government, viz. [namely/that is] freedom and security. And however our eyes may be dazzled with show, or our ears deceived by sound, however prejudice may warp our wills or interest darken our understanding, the simple voice of nature and reason will say, it is right.
I draw my idea of the form of government from a principle in nature which no art [spit as a curse and insult to the word ‘art’: “propaganda”] can overturn, viz. that the more simple anything is, the less liable it is to be disordered, and the easier repaired when disordered; and with this maxim in view, I offer a few remarks on the so much boasted constitution of England. That it was noble for the dark and slavish times in which it was erected, is granted. When the world was overrun with tyranny, the least remove therefrom was a glorious rescue. But that it is imperfect, subject to convulsions, and incapable of producing what it seems to promise, is easily demonstrated.
…
There is something exceedingly ridiculous in the composition of monarchy. It first excludes a man from the means of information, yet empowers him to act in cases where the highest judgment is required. The state of a king shuts him from the world, yet the business of a king requires him to know it thoroughly; wherefore the different parts, by unnaturally opposing and destroying each other, prove the whole character to be absurd and useless.
…
MANKIND being originally equal in the order of creation, the equality could only be destroyed by some subsequent circumstance. The distinctions of rich and poor may in a great measure be accounted for, and that without having recourse to the harsh ill-sounding names of oppression and avarice. Oppression is often the consequence, but seldom or never the means of riches; and though avarice will preserve a man from being necessitously poor, it generally makes him too timorous to be wealthy.
But there is another and greater distinction for which no truly natural or religious reason can be assigned, and that is the distinction of men into KINGS and SUBJECTS. Male and female are the distinctions of nature, good and bad the distinctions of heaven; but how a race of men came into the world so exalted above the rest, and distinguished like some new species, is worth inquiring into, and whether they are the means of happiness or of misery to mankind.
…
Government by kings was first introduced into the world by the Heathens, from whom the children of Israel copied the custom. It was the most prosperous invention the Devil ever set on foot for the promotion of idolatry. The Heathens paid divine honors to their deceased kings, and the Christian world hath improved on the plan by doing the same to their living ones. How impious is the title of sacred majesty applied to a worm, who in the midst of his splendor is crumbling into dust!
As the exalting one man so greatly above the rest cannot be justified on the equal rights of nature, so neither can it be defended on the authority of scripture; for the will of the Almighty as declared by Gideon and the prophet Samuel expressly disapproves of government by kings. All anti-monarchical parts of scripture have been very smoothly glossed over in monarchical governments, but they undoubtedly merit the attention of countries which have their governments yet to form. “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s” is the scripture doctrine of courts, yet it is no support of monarchical government, for the Jews at that time were without a king, and in a state of vassalage to the Romans.
…
Monarchy is ranked in scripture as one of the sins of the Jews, for which a curse in reserve is denounced against them. The history of that transaction is worth attending to.
The children of Israel being oppressed by the Midianites, Gideon marched against them with a small army, and victory thro’ the divine interposition decided in his favor. The Jews, elate with success, and attributing it to the generalship of Gideon, proposed making him a king, saying, Rule thou over us, thou and thy son and thy son’s son. Here was temptation in its fullest extent; not a kingdom only, but a hereditary one, but Gideon in the piety of his soul replied, I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule over you. THE LORD SHALL RULE OVER YOU. Words need not be more explicit; Gideon doth not decline the honor but denieth their right to give it; neither doth he compliment them with invented declarations of his thanks, but in the positive style of a prophet charges them with disaffection to their proper Sovereign, the King of heaven.
…
To the evil of monarchy we have added that of hereditary succession; and as the first is a degradation and lessening of ourselves, so the second, claimed as a matter of right, is an insult and imposition on posterity [future generations/our children]. For all men being originally equals, no one by birth could have a right to set up his own family in perpetual preference to all others forever, and though himself might deserve some decent degree of honors of his contemporaries, yet his descendants might be far too unworthy to inherit them. One of the strongest natural proofs of the folly of hereditary right in kings is that nature disapproves it, otherwise she would not so frequently turn it into ridicule by giving mankind an ass for a lion.
…
In absolute monarchies the whole weight of business, civil and military, lies on the king; the children of Israel in their request for a king urged this plea, “that he may judge us and go out before us and fight our battles.” But in countries where he is neither a judge nor a general, as in England, a man would be puzzled to know what is his business. (What is the business of the president, if he does not participate in war and thus be subject the code of military justice, nor does he have the power to express a moral judgment on a matter to the public as it concerns individuals?)
…
…
…
No country on the globe is so happily situated, or so internally capable of raising a fleet as America. Tar, timber, iron, and cordage are her natural produce. We need go abroad for nothing. Whereas the Dutch, who make large profits by hiring out their ships of war to the Spaniards and Portuguese, are obliged to import most of the materials they use. We ought to view the building a fleet as an article of commerce, it being the natural manufactory of this country. It is the best money we can lay out. A navy when finished is worth more than it cost, and is that nice point in national policy in which commerce and protection are united. Let us build. If we want them not, we can sell, and by that means replace our paper currency with ready gold and silver.
…
Commerce diminishes the spirit both of patriotism and military defense. And history sufficiently informs us that the bravest achievements were always accomplished in the non-age [youth/immaturity] of a nation. With the increase of commerce England hath lost its spirit. The city of London, notwithstanding its numbers, submits to continued insults with the patience of a coward. The more men have to lose, the less willing are they to venture. The rich are in general slaves to fear, and submit to courtly power with the trembling duplicity of a spaniel.
…
When William the Conqueror subdued England, he gave them law at the point of the sword; and until we consent that the seat of government in America be legally and authoritatively occupied, we shall be in danger of having it filled by some fortunate ruffian [the traitorous filth by the name ‘Trump’], who may treat us in the same manner, and then where will be our freedom? where our property?
As to religion, I hold it to be the indispensable duty of government to protect all conscientious professors thereof,34 and I know of no other business which government hath to do therewith. Let a man throw aside that narrowness of soul, that selfishness of principle, which the niggards35 of all professions are so unwilling to part with, and he will be at once delivered of his fears on that head. Suspicion is the companion of mean souls, and the bane of all good society. For myself, I fully and conscientiously believe that it is the will of the Almighty that there should be a diversity of religious opinions among us. It affords a larger field for our Christian kindness. Were we all of one way of thinking, our religious dispositions would want matter for probation; and on this liberal principle I look on the various denominations among us to be like children of the same family, differing only in what is called their Christian names.
…
Immediate necessity makes many things convenient, which if continued would grow into oppressions. Expedience and right are different things. When the calamities of America required a consultation, there was no method so ready, or at that time so proper, as to appoint persons from the several Houses of Assembly for that purpose; and the wisdom with which they have proceeded hath preserved this continent from ruin. But as it is more than probable that we shall never be without a CONGRESS, every wellwisher to good order must own [admit] that the mode for choosing members of that body, deserves consideration. And I put it as a question to those who make a study of mankind whether representation and election is not too great a power for one and the same body of men to possess. When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.
It is from our enemies that we often gain excellent maxims, and are frequently surprised into reason by their mistakes. Mr. Cornwall (one of the Lords of the Treasury) treated the petition of the New York Assembly with contempt because that House, he said, consisted but of twenty-six members, which trifling number, he argued, could not with decency be put for the whole. We thank him for his involuntary honesty.*
…
In regard to the vile abomination of false security that evil government secrecy has begotten with creatures that have never been more repulsive to the sight of men and God alike—monstrous things like the C.I.A. more properly known as “the Central Imbecile Agency”.
Ceremony, and even silence, from whatever motive they may arise, have a hurtful tendency when they give the least degree of countenance [support] to base and wicked performances; wherefore, if this maxim be admitted, it naturally follows that the King’s Speech, as being a piece of finished villainy, deserved and still deserves a general execration [condemnation] both by the Congress and the people. Yet, as the domestic tranquility of a nation depends greatly on the chastity of what may properly be called NATIONAL MANNERS, it is often better to pass some things over in silent disdain than to make use of such new methods of dislike as might introduce the least innovation on that guardian of our peace and safety [admitting new evils that are so great they demand the least creative ability of the righteous to invent a solution for].
….
I could, if I judged it proper, produce the opinion of some of the ablest and most experienced men [and women] on this continent; and whose sentiments on that head are not yet publicly known. It is in reality a self-evident position: For no nation in a state of foreign dependence, limited in its commerce and cramped and fettered in its legislative powers, can ever arrive at any material eminence. America doth not yet know what opulence is [not even now!!! The most rich are the most destitute in this corrupt nation we are left with.]; and although the progress which she hath made stands unparalleled in the history of other nations, it is but childhood compared with what she would be capable of arriving at, had she, as she ought to have, the legislative powers in her own hands. [And now you fettered the USA to the Jews!? Even the monarchs of Paine’s time would have known better, mired in ignorance as they were having only passed on greater stupidity to each subsequent generation of their ill-begotten heretical spawn!].
…
The present state of America is truly alarming to every man who is capable of reflection. Without law, without government, without any other mode of power than what is founded on, and granted by, courtesy. Held together by an unexampled occurrence of sentiment which is nevertheless subject to change, and which every secret enemy is endeavoring to dissolve. Our present condition is Legislation without law, wisdom without a plan, a constitution without a name, and, what is strangely astonishing, perfect Independence contending for dependence.
…
In short, Independence is the only bond that can tie and keep us together. We shall then see our object, and our ears will be legally shut against the schemes of an intriguing as well as a cruel enemy.
…
On these grounds I rest the matter. And as no offer hath yet been made to refute the doctrine contained in the former editions of this pamphlet, it is a negative proof that either the doctrine cannot be refuted or that the party in favor of it are too numerous to be opposed. WHEREFORE, instead of gazing at each other with suspicious or doubtful curiosity, let each of us hold out to his neighbor the hearty hand of friendship and unite in drawing a line which, like an act of oblivion, shall bury in forgetfulness every former dissension. Let the names of Whig and Tory [Democrat and Republican] be extinct; and let none other be heard among us than those of a good citizen, an open and resolute friend, and a virtuous supporter of the RIGHTS of MANKIND and of the FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES OF AMERICA.
Fin.
(Full text click this link: DO NOT CLICK!!!)