The Gasoline Fight

Zoolander.

Have you seen the movie? Do you recall the gasoline fight that happens?

The four male “models” who are professionally “good looking” all have an imbecilic frolic at a gasoline station. We all know that males are always ugly, but in this case the term is a metaphor to indicate they are people who are literally evil but appear as good—nothing about beauty.

In any case, that gasoline fight is like the circumcision situation in North America.

There is a Jew, Ben Stiller. There is a Mexican. There is a Black Person. There is a Native American. All four are circumcised and are making the Jew claim, except the Mexicans, Black people, and Native Americans are trying to make them for their own identity group as nation, ethnicity, or both.

They do so thinking they are having fun and innocent playtime with sing song jolly jacking but in reality they are irresponsible fools spraying each other with gasoline. In the movie, Ben Stiller leaves the area for some distraction, I forget what. Then he looks back at his friends playing, and admires the scene. It is in that moment, when one of them, completely oblivious of the danger and situation, lights a cigarette and they all die in a fiery explosion except Ben Stiller, the Jew.

That is the circumcision problem in the USA.

Jews and only Jews have a right to that claim, and only when they accept Christ as the truth. Not necessarily as Christians, but they definitely need to be making a public claim about identifying as Jews who accept Jesus as the Christ because it is a simple logical, rational, and necessary conclusion to provide reconciliation with everyone else in the world despite their hateful, inhuman beliefs carried on since ancient times. The group Jews for Jesus is an example of Jews who do that.

First of all neither Black people, Mexicans, nor Native Americans have a sacred claim equivalent of the Jews. They have indigenous beliefs that trace back to ancestors vastly removed from modern day civilization just like everyone else does. Nothing special about that. They also do not have a national claim to identity. Mexicans are the most idiotic on that account, because they fail to realize that at the relevant time, Mexico was non-existent as what they are attempting to claim as a national identity.

Native Americans are similar in that case. They were a diverse collection of tribes, much like Jews, but the difference is that they do not have a unifying doctrine of written sacred literature that ties them all together in Story. That doctrine has to be written for the sacred claim that the Jews make. Literally written in human language with the use of words to communicate information. That human act of creation is what is spiritually sacred about their doctrine, and why Jesus is referred to as the “Word” and there is so much emphasis on written laws and texts.

What makes the Jews unique is that they have a continuous thread of Story that traces back to an ancient origin at least 6,000 years. That Story has changed and evolved over time, been edited, modified, texts added, etc. but that is not the point. The point is that they maintained the same collective written Story continuously without breaks all this time. That is why Jews (and Christians) have a valid sacred claim that includes the practice of circumcision, when nobody else does, not even Muslims.

There may be loose collections of diverse ancient texts and writing to reference for all other cultures, but the difference with the Jews is that they were nationally recognized as a legitimate foreign nation in ancient times by all other secular authorities at the time, such as the Roman Empire, Babylonian Empire, etc. They have that history of a valid, recognized identity that is embedded in our shared cultural hstory, and it is why their claim cannot be ignored, while the Mexican, Black, and Native American claims to circumcision are entirely false, frivolous, evil, selfish, inapropriate, and born as an abomination of hateful ignorance with no concept of what they are claiming.

They think it is just about having a special club to wear a special nametag with, and some faithless Jews encourage that because they have no faith in their history and are stupid, but being Jewish is not just about being in a special club. It is about having a divine purpose in the world that provides meaning to ones life as it applies to a highest divine will of incomprehensible goodness and wisdom. Just as the Christian claim is. That is certainly what they believe, except if they deny Christ, then they cannot make that claim because they deny it with Christ. They choose evil, hate, and worldly injustice for greed, coveting, and idolatry by denying Christ.

Because they are faithless, and have always been faithless according to their texts, much like a decent amount of all types of people, they do not want to believe in the purpose and function of the Christ, Jesus to their culture. By denying his purpose in the divine plan, they deny it to all of their people, because of how they deny it as legally written and recorded by sacred texts maintained by Jews— the first Christians. It’s always been like that for them. 12 tribes, 11 of them are stupid and revert back to Paganism with their circumcision and it makes evil worse than ever, intolerably so, and they eventually get destroyed by some nation or another because of how vile they are. Then in their pathetic state of suffering, they all scurry back to the one who was keeping the doctrine, just as they will do to Christianity now that this is becoming so simply explained even small children can understand that mystery if they can read this far.

That’s why they are evil. They think their identity in the world today is all about denying Jesus, but that is simply identifying with evil! They reject the only good thing about their entire sacred claim to identify with the opposite without knowing what that opposite is. The opposite is incomprehensible evil— stupidity. It is so obvious in the evidence of their crimes and lawlessness in the world today. They go around thinking they are fulfilling a divine purpose by being purposely evil, hateful, and destructive to good! Those fools! Would they have ever been created in the image of the divine to go around the world doing evil to all of creation!? Would they have been cast out if their purpose was to be evil!? Would they ever have been tolerated all those thousands of years if they were doing evil!? No. They would have been destroyed again and again and again for the same thing they are doing now because it is typical of their faithless minds to conclude when they misunderstand the purpose of circumcision. They would attribute that destruction to the wrath of God because someone told them that their toxic, poisonous, and hateful behavior in the community is going to rile up all forms of good people who desire justice, law, security, and safety, to exterminate them.

Just stop being stupid you damn fools! Find a way to incorporate the Christ into your doctrine and make it public to everyone so we can trust you! If you continue to make your public claim as a denial of Jesus the Christ, then whether we are Christian or not, faithful or atheistic, there is only one way we can interpret you people: evil doers, toxic parasites, poisonous betrayers, and malignant fiends to be excised!

The easiest thing to do would be to just accept Catholic doctrine because that is already taken care of and has the continuous story they’ve been maintaining ever since Christ and before. However, they could also write something totally new. A completely new Story that totally redefines their mythos and theological beliefs and identity. It could totally contradict or be in conflict with their original doctrine if they use the faith I provided with the function of Story I am establishing a religion from. Not because of the faith in that object of utility—but faith in the implications, and universal spiritual value and significance of it as a work of Story. They don’t need to if they manage to come up with some sort of continuous thing that does not contradict previous doctrine, but if they need to start over, they can keep the old doctrine as valid, use Goto as a conduit—passageway, doorway, and object of impersonal matter—to maintain continuity with whatever new Story they provide for themselves.

In any case, until they do that they are evil. Unless Mexicans, Jews, and Native Americans do that, they are also evil, except infinitely more stupid and entirely powerless because their claim is impotent, based on made up concepts that are entirely falsified, illogical, and have no ancient tradition that has been maintained as justification. They were never recognized as ancients, on par with Jews as being in harmony with the universal truth of divine being of unified singularity that was philosophically understood before it was theologically understood. The theology was added to make the philosophy easier for less privileged people to understand with the use of Story.

That application of Story, as a means of transforming wisdom into faith for people who do not devote their lives to the study to be able to understand it, is what I am working on establishing as a practical religion that all other religions should be able to participate in as well without conflicting with their current beliefs. All they would need to do to justify their cooperation is create Story that explains how they connect to the “Halls of Remembrance” as it is called in the first novel, but that is not the formal name, just the concept.

Anyone can entirely redesign how that place looks, works, and functions, how the mystics are trained, what they do, and all that, while still maintaining the concept of a unifying source from which all forms of Story are derived. That source of origin that is the same for both philosophy and theology, only talked about differently depending on which direction you are contemplating it from.

The purpose of the religion is to have a single concept that is designated as “canon” for the definitive terminology, laws, and rules of existence as a foundation acceptable by all faiths. There needs to be one place designated as the authority on that concept and only one place. Others can be in harmony with that authority with their own, but if there is ever conflict, it will be the one traditional source that diligently maintains doctrine, law, and tradition without end that is always the final word, just as the Roman Catholics are for Christians today.

All manner of Christians can make all manner of claims, and Protestants are most frivolous about doing that. However, whatever the hell they say, it is usually pointless, a waste of time, and not worth contemplating if it is in conflict with the Roman Catholic Magisterium. This is why: when the Pope makes a formal, definitive statement about Christian doctrine, Christianity all over the world changes in accordance with his authority. Protestants do not have that authority, power, and never will. The very fact that they are combative, antagonistic, hostile, rebelious to authority, and defiant to law, doctrine, and faith are all indications of their unreliability and untrustworthiness.

However, having a designated single source of authority is why all other religions should take an interest in what I am doing. They should have a say in what that foundation is, especially if they are going to be using the spiritual technology, science, and understanding that the faith of it makes public freely, charitably, and for the benefit of all people. If they are going to be using that, they should probably have someone as a representative there who can speak for them, ensure their concerns are being addressed, and work together with everyone else to maintain a peaceful community without necessary conflict.

The problem with cirumcision in the world today is that it creates necessary conflict because of how they take away the rights, security, and safety of a man’s life within his private home. If it becomes dangerous to be uncircumcised, such as in the world today when we are threatened by national governments, social systems, and all manner of idiots on the streets, then our very home is threatened because we cannot acquire the resources to live our lives safely. We cannot get food, water, and shelter without being under constant threat in the community, and that defeats the entire purpose of civilization and government.

That is why conflict is necessary. We will have to fight you for all of that authority back, and prevent you from ever being able to have it again, because that is the only way it can work. For you to have your wants in your private home as safe, secure, and protected, you need to respect our laws in the public domain with government, economy, and entertainment. However, because those have now been violated and defiled to such an extreme and intolerable way, the circumcised people will lose their privilege to be tolerated in a community, because it will no longer be a protected “right”, which it never was in my opinion, but now that is unanimous as truth and fact.

End.

What's the USA's motto, is it a great nation?

If America had a motto, I think it may be something like this, “Freedom is the highest good a nation can provide, and it is done with sensible and just Democracy that protects the sacred rights every person is entitled to by a government which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” That last little bit there is the key phrase. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Those three things were decided upon after great consideration a long time ago in light of the nature of humanity, the purpose of government, and civilization in general. They were set as the foundation for the USA to be built upon.

Right now, the USA isn’t anywhere close to what that dream intended for it to be. What it is now is a threatening abomination that every other nation in the world should seriously take measures to subdue before another and more catastrophic world war occurs. However, if the USA government is maintaining its nation the way its supposed to, and not fouling it up and doing nothing to make things livable, then I think it would be really great in certain ways, but not everything. It would be the best for artists, have great entertainment, and great education. It’s none of those things now, and is probably among the worst for that. That would also attract some of the best warriors, because after a long day of battle and training, warriors especially like to have fun.

One of the things about the USA is that aside from Native Americans who are a diminishing minority (which shouldn’t be a cause for concern because even though racial ancestry gets mixed you can still keep the cultural memory and value alive), there isn’t really a traditional culture for the USA that has matured through countless generations, such as a place like China, or Iran, or India, or Ethiopia. In the USA, people of all sorts come here and bring their culture with them, so ours takes all kinds of forms and changes all the time. It’s very chaotic. There is something to be said about the value of a time tested culture of a very old nation that makes it uniquely special and great in its own way.

I would say that the Native American’s are the USA’s for that, but I don’t think that would be accurate, because the people who established the USA sort of just took over the place and made everything very different very fast. It’s like a transplant of civilization across the Atlantic ocean which took over the entire environment. It’s definitely not fair what happened to the Native Americans, but we can’t go back in time and do things differently, so we basically respect Native Americans here with special cultural privileges. We try to protect that culture from being totally overwhelmed by outside influences so people can remember the ancients of this land and cultivate their wisdom.

Did you know that back when Native American tribes used to go to war with each other for glory and resources (like all people everywhere probably did at some point), it was more honorable and won more glory for a warrior to earn a coup, which was a near kill but skillfully restrained so that the other warrior knew that they could have been killed and weren’t, than actually killing other warriors in battle. Something like that is recognized because the defeated warrior accepts their defeat and leaves, which is how they keep their honor despite being defeated. I bet you that is the kind of thing the traditional samurai in Japan could resonate with, because even without knowing their culture in depth, I know they respected honor on the highest level like that, which is mercy. I think that’s why they cut off the samurai’s head when they did seppuku.

We are talking about different civilizations on different scales here. When a lord loses to a lord, he can’t just go to a farm and no longer be a lord. There is a divine connection that powers the authority of a true lord, and one cannot relinquish it after they accept it and still be honorable. Doing that would be a betrayal of the sacred after receiving its blessing, which is universally dishonorable and despised. So rather than go on fighting to the bitter end with countless lives of people in his care, he himself dies for them and severs that connection bound to his very life.

Things are different now though because of how much people have learned from each other all over the world, and I think most nations are realizing the sense there is in keeping divine authority separate from secular authority. A mortal human should not at the same time have the power of secular authority and the authority of divine power. That’s another topic for another day. In any case, matters of honor are universal among warriors of all cultures because it’s pretty much the same everywhere, just done in different styles for different reasons.

So… um… what the USA leaders are doing now is dishonorable because they are betraying the sacred principles of the very government they are using for its secular power. It’s horribly evil and unjustified, and they are doing a lot of harm and no good with it, which defeats not only the purpose of the US government, but of all governments anywhere. That is a threatening notion if you consider the destructive power of an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction, many of which probably vastly exceed what was used in WW2, but are kept classified.