There will never be a "king of kings"

As in a single nation that rules over all other nations. That will never happen and you shouldn’t even be trying to do that because it is evil. The concept of “Jesus Christ” as the “king of kings” is that he is an imaginary friend! He is not a real person! He is invisible, non-bodily, and even though identified as a person, you know for a certainty that there is no human being on earth who that person is.

Do you know why it won’t happen? Other people live in the world and we do not want anyone ruling over us. We will destroy you and the world itself to stop that from happening. That much is certain because of the same reason why you fools want to conquer the world, so you should be able to understand that. The only difference is that you are not being threatened! You are not in danger of losing your freedom! You only imagined that you were because of a cowardly response to your own irrational paranoia. That is not okay, and will not be allowed. Because you tried, you now are threatened and in danger and there is nothing you can do to stop it. You feared something and then brought it about because of how cowardly you were to deserve such a horrible end.

Also, you fools who want to call me a hypocrite because of how powerful as an individual I am are simply small minded fools without an imagination! You imbeciles are too stupid to be able to perceive what is actually happening. You see a bunch of glitter and illusions conjured by the Devil and are fooled like the dumbest suckers of life who allowed themselves to be scammed by something like Bitcoin. You see that glitter but do not notice what is golden. You see money but ignore what money may accomplish. You see things that are used for happiness, but do not see what is the happiness itself.

That is why you people are so afraid, threatened, and jealous of me. You are idiots of the worst kind and that is not going to change because your actions are recorded in history and they will never be justified.

So… stop trying to be a “king of kings” or “supreme ruler” or some other kind of megalomaniac fool who thinks he knows better than everyone else when he can’t even figure out what is best for himself! Morons like that Chinese turd and communist savage think they are being selfless because they are self-destructive, but that is only vainglory— that is to say: false glory. They are deluding themselves into thinking self-destruction is the same as selflessness and have never been more dangerously stupid. They not only are destroying themselves, but they have endangered everyone whom they are forcing themselves upon— the Chinese people.

If I were you, I would have him deposed, that entire government restructured, and if he doesn’t go willingly, pull him apart limb by limb and leave his bloody remains in a forgotten ditch and move on without him. That is what we are going to do in the USA to Trump, Biden, Senators, and anyone else in the government who has chosen to be self-destructive obstacle of total arrogance lying to themselves about being humble that endangers everyone else. They are only being “humble” to gain the glory of being perceived as having the virtue of humility, but that is not humility— that is the worst kind of pride. It is the arrogance of Lucifer and suffers the worst condemnation, punishment, and wrath of justice.

If you ever think the apropriate action is to “be humble” do so for other people’s benefit and never your own. It is never done to make yourself look good, it is done to make others look good. It is better to be proud like a lion than humble like venomous snake. It is better to be cowardly like a lion than proud as a venomous snake. It is better to maul an enemy or strike with deadly venom, than be assaulted by a fool who does not know when to be proud or when to be humble.

Christianity is most certainly not a massive group of people being directed by a single leader. That is the total antithesis of Christianity! The anti-Christ is a king who commands a Christian people as though he himself were “the Body of Christ”. The Body of Christ is and always will be: all Christian people living their own lives as INDIVIDUALS according to their own personal judgment and in the SAME DIRECTION. They are not told which way to go. They are not directed. Nobody thinks for them. Nobody decides for them. Nobody tells a Christian what to do. They know for themselves what is good and they do it of their own volition, and because it is good, all people who choose good move in the same direction of progress.

If you are moving in any direction of progress that opposes that singular and simple goal of being good— you are evil, an enemy, and need to be eliminated because of how dangerous, immoral, criminal, and threatening you are to everyone’s safety. If you are a Jew and not a Christian, you are evil. If you are a Satanist and cannot cooperate with Christians, you are evil. If you are a Christian and making yourself a problem for others because of your arrogant delusions of self-importance, you are evil. If you are a politician and cannot cooperate with the opposing political party, you are evil. All of those need to be “done away with” one way or another. If they will not walk away to save their own lives, then we will put them to death without mercy and never regret doing so.

For example: although I hate the common practice of butt fucking that most Americans seem to enjoy, I do nothing to stop others from defiling themselves by doing it unless they are trying to do it with me. I find all anal related sexual behavior disgusting, vile, foul, offensive to human dignity, and abhorrently immoral. I despise it, do not want to participate in it, and am not the least bit tempted by their pleading about it being enjoyable or good. Butt fucking is entirely wrong to me. However, I am not going to do anything to stop other people from butt fucking each other, make it illegal, or use any kind of force to compel them to be clean. I don’t give a damn what they do.

Notice how I am not being a problem for the butt fuckers. They can eat shit out of each other’s asses all they want and stick their dicks in poop while calling it love, and I am going to completely avoid them, ignore them, let them befoul themselves all they want and have nothing to do with those wretched people. Problem solved as far as I am concerned. I know what is good and I choose it of my own free will, but I would never force other people to accept my judgment, unless it was absolutely necessary for my own freedom, such as if they were trying to force themselves upon me, and I needed to destroy them in self-defense.

They can point at that self-defense and call it aggression all they want, but it doesn’t make any difference what they say because perception is not reality and illusions do not change the truth. Furthermore, the fact that they are immoral swine with poor judgment who falsely identify as Christians and use passive aggression to provoke conflict, I know they are unworthy to even consider as having a significant point of view, so their foolishness doesn’t even affect me. They are entirely irrelevant as people with thoughts, opinions, and emotions unless they start a conflict with me, in which case I will put them out of their misery as necessary and still not care at all what they think or feel about it.

If they are a good person, then their existence as a person will have significance to me, but we won’t ever need to talk about it because we won’t be causing problems for each other. We will be able to cooperate without any conflict whatsoever.

A modern explanation of the Jesus' washing his disciples' feet

A king has an unwritten social contract between his domain and himself. As the monarch the people trust him to rule effectively and benevolently and ensure they are provided for and protected from the threats of other nations and territories. In so doing the king is permitted to use violence according to his own judgment as a means of accomplishing that task.

When any person uses violence to achieve a goal, they descend to the lowest nature of the human being. That is the most base, primal, beast-like form of our existence in total expression of self without the mind. It is all animal commanded by a human purpose. For human standards violence should never be tolerated and avoided at all costs, and all conflicts should be resolved with language instead. If language fails, it is a failure of the people communicating, who have proven themselves inadequate as leaders on one side or the other or both sides.

As a result of human failure when they resort to sub human behavior of violence to achieve their goals, they come to the instinctual and stupid conclusion that because violence can silence a person’s ability to use language by ending their life it is superior to language as a form of power. It doesn’t take much intelligence to see how backwards and inhuman those conclusions of bestial humans are. However, when confronted with such fools it may be required to answer with violence, because it remains a part of human nature even if it is rejected as a means of resolving human conflict unless the situation makes non-violence impossible for the defense of one’s own life and those under their protection.

That is why a king is trusted by his citizens to employ violence while the citizens reject violence as a means of solving problems. If they use violence they generally are arrested by the king’s authorities and submitted to justice at court in which case the king or the king’s representative determine whether or not the person who used violence was acting with the king’s wisdom, which extends to all subjects as one of the benefits of a kingship. If the king wanted violence to be used it would not be against the law, but kings have the authority to judge matters outside of defined parameters according to their wisdom, because defined parameters of law are always inadequate.

Kings can be held accountable to those judgments if the wisdom of a man who is not a king proves them foolish, and thus the king must submit to his own justice in order to maintain order and retain his authority. If he defies his own justice, then the citizens have no reason to accept his justice because he does not accept it himself and it is therefore unacceptable all around.

So, knowing now that violence is beneath the dignity of human standards, a king employs violence as a servant underneath the dignity of the common man. They “wash the feet” of their servants in these situations. The use of violence does not make them greater. It makes them lesser, and they do so knowingly as a form of humility. The violence is not what gives them authority over the people, it is the wisdom they demonstrate. Wisdom is humble with power. It does not degrade those who receive its force. It uplifts them. It does not lower the common man, it raises him. This can either be in a form of “tough love” or “soft love” so to speak.

In conclusion, when a king goes to war, they do what Jesus did at the Last Supper by removing his cloak and tunic, tying a towel about his waist as the lowest, most humble servant who is half naked and may be performing services that people do not want to talk about because they are private matters that only trusted servants are in their confidence to engage in. Feet are a common metaphor for sexuality in storytelling if you are unaware. In any case, the king descends to a lower level of dignity and in effect, lowers the standard, which is why his subjects may join him in acts of violence as long as he retains his authority as the king. When the war is won, the violence is ended and people are no longer permitted to use it because the king once again raises to the base standard of dignity which all subjects receive.

In any case, violence and sex are on the same level as beneath the standard of human dignity. That’s why it is frowned upon to be fucking in public places unless it is specifically identified as an acceptable place to fuck, which is rare and usually discreet. Violence is the same way. It is frowned upon to beat your servant in public for failing at a task, if that was still done. In these days it is more like it being more appropriate to reprimand a subordinate in private than in front of others.

Last thing, if a king is failing on his end of the unwritten social agreement, the subjects may rebel against him and put him to death without a trial.