Universally applicable parental discipline (rule of thumb)

First, remove your thumb from your arse and wash off the shite with soap.

On the lips of the intelligent is found wisdom,
    but a rod for the back of one without sense. Proverbs 10:13

Unfortunately, Bible quotes need to be disentangled from the Jews because Jews have begun to pretend they are to credit for Biblical literature and are due the glory of its wisdom. There are multiple ways that is wrong, the most obvious being that the wisdom is from the divine, not the Jews, and the less obvious is the fact that such proverbs as this one are known to have been compiled from various cultures around the area from Gentiles and included in Hebrew scripture. Had the Jews not attempted to claim credit and glory of the Bible for themselves, they would be honored for maintaining it, but they are arrogant and thus must be disentangled with rebuke and awarded dishonor and disgrace for their hubris.

Now that they are isolated elsewhere, we can proceed.

Simply put: when raising a child the parent/guardian is required to discipline them to learn the ways of the world and human conduct as vitally more important than urges of animal nature. Animal nature is selfish, not evil, and it is driven by bodily urges for goods, whereas humans are driven by immaterial concepts as goods for our spirit.

Bodily urges and animal desires are fine but they must not conflict with the significance and values of human concepts relevant to the local society and the universal standard for all people, and that is why discipline is so important. Do not be afraid of discipline. Discipline is good and many people seek it for all manner of reason. It is not punishment, it is temperance, justice, and harmony. It is living one’s life so that the song of their being resonates pleasantly with all other songs of being for the music of life to be consonant and pleasing to the celestial divinities as well as mortal human beings.

So, when disciplining your child because they made an error in judgement first use language, reason, and wisdom to explain why the mistake was a mistake and what the correction is. That is found on the lips of the intelligent, and all human beings are intelligent life, so all parents are capable of this wisdom. You must lead with that first, because that is how they are expected to learn on their own when they no longer have parents or teachers to guide them. The entire purpose is to prevent mistakes from happening because you can think them through before facing the consequences of their punishment.

Perhaps as a child, you learned that electricity is hot by experience like I did by touching a electric heating coil on a stove and burning your finger. I never thought about it all that much before now other than how it hurt for some time after and took longer to heal than I expected compared to something like a skinned knee or elbow which was typically a wound over more area. In any case, the implicit lesson learned by using reason in the future was that all manner of things can be hot without needing fire, and to be aware of the dangers that poses by not wanting to experience them the hard way like I did when I was told not to touch the stove when I doubted it was working since the water was taking so long to boil.

However, like in my situation, sometimes conventional wisdom simply does not work, and for whatever reason, be it curiosity, will of rebellion, distrust, or anything else, sometimes the painful consequences need to be felt to learn the simplest of lessons. That is why discipline sometimes requires a “rod for the back of a fool”. So it is with children. If there are some ways you intend to discipline the behavior of the child by explaining why they are important for reasons that can’t be expected to fully understand yet, but they prove unreceptive, disobedient, and rebellious, then it becomes admissible to use physical force to teach the simplest form of the lesson. “Don’t do that or you will be hurt.”

These days, that should not be physically beating of the child’s body, because that is not something they should fear in human society. That used to be relevant with public floggings, torture dungeons, and things of that sort, but those are out of practice for the same reason it is unhelpful in the common household as it reinforces the opposite of what needs to be taught. If they learn to fear physical violence to their body as the consequences of misbehavior, they will be maladapted to social situations as adults and may misinterpret ideological threats to their beliefs, or insults of outrage, to be dangers to their physical body when they are most certainly and by principle not for the very reason that fool fears physical violence being done to their own body!

It is a mutual agreement that does not need codification or writing and applies to all neighbors in civilized society prohibiting such responses with the exception of a last resort, and if necessary, to trust such violence to professionals disciplined to enforce the law with as much restraint from violence as possible. If such a mistake in judgment is made, it could be catastrophic, especially if it was made from a person of social significance like a president or acting with the authority of the president. For such people to prove to be fools, it is the most self-destructive thing possible to their reputation and public image and their own fault.

The very last thing you want to happen is to expect an ideology to respond with physical force, and if you know they will, to do all that you can to prevent that response from being necessary. If a nation or individual is so uncooperative, foolish, obstinate, and uncharitable as to leave no other option for the other party’s ideology to be accommodated with compromise, it will in fact result in physical violence because that is the final and certain way to teach something to fools who will not use reason or sense. That is why tyranny is always a mistake and has proven to be over and over again. Do not negotiate with terrorists threatening violence to get what they want, such as by executing hostages, blowing up buildings, and the like, as is well known by leaders.

However, if an individual or group with ideological conflict expresses that, in general, violence will happen if you do not negotiate with them at all while they are trying to prevent that violence by negotiating, that is different. They are not responsible for that violence simply by knowing it is the last resort to help other people learn to help themselves. That is a warning that the stove will burn your hand if you touch it, not that they themselves will burn your hand if you touch the stove. In those cases, and the one involving me, the tyrants are using passive physical violence with inaction, and they become the antagonist and source of the problem. The become criminal and complicit with violent offenders by not responding in the capacity that they are specifically responsible for and sworn to do as well.

When matters of ideological judgment, negotiation, and compromise involve nations, the people making those decisions are expected to be highly capable in the use of their reasoning faculties and proficiency with rational and critical thought. Spiritual proficiency and understanding may be applicable as well, but it is unnecessary, possibly distracting, and only useful if both parties recognize the same spiritual truth. In any case, whatever spiritual understanding there may be, it is invalid without the foundation of human reason and rational understanding as the foundation for it. Human beings have animal bodies, which you cannot remove without removing the entire human being from life, so you simply cannot ignore that fact because it is the most substantial truth, and why reason is required for those matters because it is a quality of the animal body that leads to higher nature.

In this day and age, it is highly embarrassing for a nation that I must even explain this, and to the USA government too! That is a nation founded entirely on reasonable agreement with no necessary spiritual authority besides the mutual agreement on the bottom line of Natural reality for how that reason is derived! That very bottom line is the same one that Judaism is derived, and that which Christianity, Islam, and all other religions are derived and why they are professed as truth! If those other religions are functioning properly, they should keep people from needing to descend all the way down to that authority for proof, because religions’ place is underneath humanity, as the footstool of humanity, not the crown on our head as the symbolic authority of our power. It helps us reach the top shelf.

So when disciplining a child with physical force, violence against their body is not to be used because that should not be a threatened consequence in modern civilization. There are places to go to express physical violence, but the court of law is not that place. So, use physical force with things like “time out” or temporarily removing creature comforts like toys and privileges they enjoy. That is a very meaningful consequence because it reinforces the concept that if they misbehave in adult life, it could result in the lose of those things. Not only as an individual who may go bankrupt or not be able to afford what they want for themselves, but on a national scale, the entire economy may be in danger because of political misbehavior known as corruption. If that happens, all people in that nation risk losing what they are privileged to enjoy as a civilization. Things like food, water, electricity, and all that stuff provided for all citizens without need of acquiring it on our own aside from paying taxes as necessary and abiding by the law.

There is no requirement to work, only pay taxes on what you do gain through work. Do you know why that is? It is a natural human desire to work productively and be of use to others; an urge to our being. You don’t need to make people do it because we do it on our own unless there is a problem preventing it from happening like systematic racism, income inequality, or monopolized industries strangling competition. In worst case scenarios, there is an even greater problem than all of those combined that results in people refusing to contribute because taxes are used for what is destructive to themselves.

Preventing your children from being able to watch tv or play video games as a consequence for their disobedience after first explaining why it is wrong through use of reason, is much worse than a spanking on the buttocks. That is applicable to children, btw, and the government has absolutely no business using such methods to attempt to “discipline” their citizens, and if that is found out to be part of their abuse of power, it needs the harshest punishment for the crime applicable. First of all, they never expressed what they want, or why, and so if they are punishing me for some ungodly reason, there is no possible way I can know what it is.

You expect me to avoid pain and suffering and seek pleasure as though it will teach me something about human behavior? What kind of fools would think that teaches anything to a person! Human beings can experiment on animals with restraint because animals do not comprehend what human beings do, and thus cannot suffer human pain by being experimented on as it would cause a human pain. Bodily pain, cruelty, and things like that are things they know well enough and should not be made to suffer, but they don’t understand the importance of human rights as they differ from animal rights and cannot even sense them.

Those things do not cause any pain nor pleasure to animals unless they are made to understand them to a limited degree. That is not all that uncommon of a cultural quality either, and why there were pagan cults that made idols for dogs, cats, and oxen. That isn’t a problem unless humans are being subject to those idols which are made for animals and thus reverting them to non-human, animal behavior when animals communicate through them in their limited way with humans. You cannot condition a human like an animal because humans don’t think or make decisions like animals do.

You can only condition human behavior by using explicit reason reinforced with physical force when necessary. Explicit reason implies direct verbal teaching or written doctrine being taught, and physical force is only used when reason fails to teach what is necessary. That is one of the reasons why taking away video games from a child for disobeying a parent is so horrible. Not only do they suffer the lack of pleasure and experience boredom, but their dignity is insulted in the highest way possible that a human being can suffer. Although they may not realize it, that is the pain that makes it so horrible.

You are basically telling them that they are acting in a way that is unworthy of a human being and thus have to be taught like an animal. By feeling the outrage of that insult, it should reinforce a universal standard of human dignity which is the entire reason why the behavior was expected and explained in the first place whatever it was! You should not be making arbitrary rules to apply and discipline just to exert power if your rules do not have a good reason you know yourself. If that happens, the parent will need teaching by physical force from the child when they are able to do so, usually by shutting the parent’s out of the goodness of their life when they are adults which is usually available to all people except untrustworthy enemies.

Whatever the government is doing to me with excessive use of physical force, is one of the most horrid abominations of authority ever conceived by men and women. It is not only ineffective, but it is stupid, unlawful, cruel, and totally self-destructive to not only the nation, but all civilization the nation is in an unwritten agreement with. The fact that the best minds capable of reason and critical thought for the use of good judgment are expected as the requirement of government leadership, but that they would make such foolish mistakes is an idiocy of such imminent danger that any and all methods of annihilating the cause and restoring order is the highest priority of all human beings everywhere.

I know that as an individual, but eventually, everyone is going to know that, and everyone will use whatever power is at their availability to do what they can to stop the USA government. Just like I do. What is that for me? Writing, reasoning, teaching, working tirelessly to explain the reasons why they should not put their hand on the hot stove! Then seeing them do it and try to hide the embarassment of such a stupid mistake and pretend like nothing happened. Except this is not a human body we are talking about, nor a child, nor a person. It is a national government, and the pain it causes is infinitely worse than the blister on a finger. What will happen when the average citizens of Russia or China or Japan realize the danger they are in from the USA?

The USA’s crime is a sin that requires death to reconcile, and there is only one possibility for that to occur, and guess what? It already happened. Do you know what that means? It means that I am correct by pointing out the truth of Jesus the Christ as something entirely different than myself and still applicable to the situation. It also means that if the people want forgiveness for such a sin, they are going to have to grant it through a public confession of their faith in Jesus, submitting themselves to the authority of the Church he established with Peter as the rock with the keys to life and death who is the only human authority to say who would be forgiven and not. You cannot fake something like that because it is entirely public life and trusted in private unless you are proven to be untrustworthy in public life and thus not in provate life either! That requires a public confession and demonstration by way of life at the very least, but if the trust is broken, then the result is imprisonment.

So, let’s say the USA does not do that, like the arrogant apes who committed the sin are too stubborn to understand or even consider as a reasonable possibility regardless of culture, faith, or doctrine. It is a universal truth whether they like it or not, and salvation, forgiveness, and life are the reward for understanding and accepting it, with or without religion or the “Jewish beliefs”. It only applies to Jews because it is their own way of salvation since they are the ones who committed such a sin first and thus needed readmittance back into the good graces of civilization with other nations who they sinned against in the worst way and betrayed the trust of.

It’s as they say, in the scripture, the wages of sin are death. If the USA will not give up its sin and accept the reward of forgiveness the way it was shown by Jesus who died crucified on a cross to express it as the highest possible cost he could pay, then the USA will be rewarded with death. Not the death of a single person. The death of the entire nation. That is what is required, and there will not be peace, happiness, justice, or rest until it does. Everyone against the USA and it is not a person, so it does not have human rights. There is no need to hold restraint when destroying it, even if it means killing millions and millions of people who are trying to defend it as slaves to evil. It is not a person. It holds no authority of human beings now that it has betrayed the source of its authority and the authority was removed. You would be a fool to trust or help them in any way, and I urge you for your own sakes to not do so.

By choosing the way of forgiveness, that means that the USA needs to lay down its life, like a lamb to the slaughter. They must open their doors to the public who will make all secrets known without endangering lives of law abiding citizens, and submit by representative completely to reconciliation and what is required for the identified sins. The fact that Christianity is a universal doctrine means that it can be done without Christianity, but Christian truth will harmonize with whatever is done because that is how universal truth works. It is in total agreement with all of its forms of expression. It is basic practice of human forgiveness between humans. In this case, the humans representing the national government asking for forgiveness from who the USA national government offended, which at the highest level is most apropriately the USA citizens.

Honestly, there should be no resistance from the representatives doing that because it is not personal to them. They are representing something other than themselves. They have no reason to resist, but if they do resist, there is only one reason: they are criminals and are hiding their sins.

I don’t know how much more I can attempt to reason with whoever reads this to teach them do what is in their best interest, but eventually this too will stop, and the rod upon the fool’s back will begin. Then they will be made to hurt in body and spirit as they are punished criminally and insulted for acting like animals and requiring animal conditioning to be made compliant with human beings even though they do not understand.