Insults and Secret Agents
Do you know what the difference is between a bully, meanie, and jerk compared to myself?
Although we both use hurtful words to attack, the difference is the intention and imagined result. Usually the bully has taken no time to imagine the outcome of the conflict, or if they have they have imagined some sort of selfish motive for serving their own delusions. As for myself the outcome I have imagined has nothing to do with me, and is in fact entirely selfless.
While the bully uses an insult and hurtful words for the most simplistic reason: to hurt another person, denigrate them, and when perceived in comparison to their own delusional self-image, that nurtures a sense of toxic vanity that is like a harmful street drug doing more self-destructive damage than any perceived high or good.
Someone like me only rarely insults an individual person, and never without provocation. Most often I insult and attack ideas that people are identifying with, and to their shame, the people who identify with those ideas feel hurt as though they themselves were being attacked. Ignorant savages. Have some humility you rotten fools! Ideas like that are far greater than the individual person you think you are, and you are nowhere near worthy of claiming responsibility for the identity of that idea yourself, so you shouldn’t feel hurt because you are not superhuman and you should know that.
However, the main difference is that my insults are intended to identify a problem for the purpose of correcting it. Not for my own benefit, for the benefit of the target of the insult who will correct their problem and become better themselves. As such, my insults are specifically targeted to identifiable problems of valid criticism that can be improved. I prefer to use constructive criticism, but in most cases my insults are provoked because of some offense that was caused by the target idea— usually a shitty form of product designed to be hurtful to Gentiles because of the toxic delusion of circumcision that infects the masses like a parasitic tumor. That provokes great wrath not only from men like me, but from the universe itself in the form of spiritual mystery, which is why I often point out the impending catastrophe those people are sowing for themselves to reap later.
That is the difference. I break down my enemies so they can rebuild themselves better. So they can identify what the problem is and resolve it. I do not get any pleasure from that kind of hurtful form of insult. I do not enjoy it, I do not want to do it, but it is necessary for the kind of problem that exists. Those circumcised tyrants are so full of themselves with arrogance that they think they are invincible or so sure of their delusion that their over inflated ego cannot be popped. To correct them, heal their sickness, and improve their lives and everyone else’s as a result, they need to have their ego popped, their vanity destroyed, their delusion demystified, and all that they lie about made known by the light of truth.
That is why that is both hurtful and healing at the same time. It is antiseptic on a festering wound that kills the corruption. It is the removal of a poison barb to stop the infection. It is the excising of a malignant parasite so that the natural host can return to its greatest potential of life. That hurts initially, but the healing is necessary, the greater good, and charitable work of a physician.
Unless you are well versed in language, comedy, and spiritual reality, you should not be attempting to use insults as your method of accomplishing your goals. Those are “dangerous” and volatile, and are easily misused to make problems worse, rather than better. That can be seen by how many fools have attempted to insult me personally and only undermined their own position. Do not do so unless you know you have no other choice, like using violence. You should have no reason to use the creative power of the human language to cut, destroy, and wound unless you know what you are doing by confronting evil who thinks they can hide behind the maxim “Speak friend and enter”. Do you not recall what happened to the great dwarven kingdom built under the mountains of Moria? What is left of those noble and industrious people now?
In any case, I am not usually one to use insults for any kind, not even harmless humor. Many people who know me personally from friendship and work relationships as collegues likely find my expressions now to be a stark contrast that is highly uncharacteristic of how they knew me. This is uncharacteristic of me, and I think that is why the highest divine saw fit for me to have this role. Insulting, using hurtful language, being destructive with words is the last thing I want to use my creative ability for. I have spent most of my life avoiding that type of thing specifically because of the kind of negativity and hate they attract, but… I suppose that was my final lesson. There is a time and a place for hate and hurt. There is a reason why that is necessary and that very reason is why that type of communication should be avoided 99 percent of the time. If it is used casually and commonly, that necessary use will be required and will be the most hurtful— lethal in fact.
Did you think the expression “the pen is mightier than the sword” was merely a metaphor? The truth is that when used as I am explaining I have done, words kill the soul of a person when a sword can only harm the body. With the soul of a person hurt, their body withers and dies soon thereafter, and there is nothing illegal, unlawful, or wrong about doing so. If you attempted to correct someone with violence, the same cannot be said and you are likely out of the limits of civilization’s laws and will become the antagonist and rightfully put to justice. If you use only words, that will not be the case. you will remain the protagonist, and the target of their use will be identified as the antagonist because they will be the ones revealed to be resorting to violence and unlawful means of retaliation.
Life is not so simple that an ape should be able to master it. You need to be able to interpret the higher conceptual reality and navigate through the invisible laws of life on your own. That is what it means to be an adult. When you are a child, adults protect you, look out for you, help you, and should never be making things more difficult to prevent your success. When you are an adult, you are expected to be able to take care of yourself. That is one of the reasons why the justice system enforces laws differently against children and adults, and why children have their crimes erased when they become adults.
If a child commits a crime, there is always an adult who is to blame for failing that child. That is never in question, which is why children are forgiven their sins in the USA at age 18 when they become legal adults. So, children most importantly should not be attempting to use insulting language against adults for two reasons: one, the adults are protecting you, helping you, and your allies, and two, adults are going whoop your ass and possibly not just with words.
However, my little kiddies and kiddos, there is the possibility that adults can be vile, evil, and lead you astray. They can attempt to use you for their crimes, take advantage of your innocence, and not be your friend, ally, or teacher, but your enemy instead. That is a grave crime in the adult world as well as the child world. “He who causes a child to sin would be better off with a mill stone tied around his neck and thrown into the sea, [than have what will be done to them in reality]”. You should never have to suspect adults, you should never worry about adults being treacherous like that, nor are we going to change society with a paranoid overprotective laws because that is a threat. It is too rare, despised, and universally unlawful for that to be a threat.
All people everywhere hate that, and when we recognize it, identify it, we go to war to stop it if necessary. Real, no shit war where we kill the people who have done it if they will not submit to justice and atone for their crimes. They will suffer the worst punishments, like crucifixion, being pulled apart in the street, or be locked in a prison cell for the rest of their lives without any communication with the outside world or entertainment to enjoy. I’m sure the last part sounds most horrific to children these days, as it does to me.
That is what the USA government has been doing by recruiting children and attempting to use them for an evil agenda that is immoral, unethical, and unlawful. Those children are being harmed in terrible ways and the adults responsible will not be able to escape punishment. That does not mean children cannot help, but they cannot help as secret agents, treacherous spies, and deceitful backstabbers. They are not capable, they do not understand what they are doing, and they are only used in that way to be a meat shield for the other spies who are using them as a diversion. Do not argue. Children are not competent enough or capable to handle warriors, individuals, and people like myself for the same reason why they should not be using insults to attack adults.
The thing about that kind of military strategy is that it is in darkness. Do you know what that means the consequences and laws are? You do not, because there are no laws, and the consequences are worse than you can possibly imagine because someone else can think of something more terrible. Because you were hiding in darkness like a treacherous spy and villainous backstabber, you will die in darkness where nobody will be able to hear you scream. Because it is military affairs you are engaging in, the enemies you face will not hesitate to kill you like any other opposing force.
What happens when a woman or child picks up the AK-47 of a man shot in the street? They are shot next, and nobody feels bad about it. Children should not be allowed to enter war ever. If they are allowed, it is still not okay and there will be consequences whether you think they are justified or not. So if you allow that to happen and think it is for a righteous cause, then you are accepting those consequences yourself. You are going to be punished for their sins as well as your own for allowing them to sin, the worst of which occur easily and often without notice in war.
Spies and secret agents who operate in darkness are killed in darkness by dark methods of killing. That is the risk they take for doing such a vile, evil, and hateful thing as betrayal, which all forms of clandestine operations are. They are lying to someone— the very light which illuminates the public for all to see: God itself. That is who they are betraying, and although there are times God may allow that— you’d better know for certain that you are justified, have a good reason, and are unwilling to do what is necessary before you decide that it is.
The Devil is the one who enacts justice against spies, betrayors, traitors, and clandestine forces, and the Devil is evil. That means that when the Devil has a chance to punish someone with the permission of God allowing them, the Devil indulges the greatest extent of torment, sadism, and suffering possible for their own selfish desires, and is justified to do so because of the culprit entering the Devil’s domain of darkness and violating the invisbile laws that are unknown. Children cannot be expected to know what those invisible laws are because they do not exist— they always change, and you can only perceive them temporarily in the moment they are relevant and that is never for certain and always with the greatest risks of fatality for a misstep.
These days there are charlatans in the USA government doing clandestine operations thinking they are actors in a movie enjoying themselves, and have made the mistake of taking the image of the Devil unto themselves as though they were justified to do the Devil’s work of justice. That is why they have falsely accused me of crimes and indulged in their perverse sadism as if they were the Devil themselves, but they are not. The Devil protects me, and do you know why? The Devil wants to punish people because the Devil is the greatest sadist, so he is willing to tempt people to make those mistakes just so he can punish them. The damn fools in the CIA cannot possibly imagine the suffering that will be brought upon them, because whatever they can imagine will be made worse by the Devil.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say I’m friendly with the Devil, but I would say that I understand the Devil well enough to know what to expect from certain things. Knowing that is enough to be able to protect myself even if I do not understand the fullness of the Devil’s plans and machinations. That is not necessary to know if you are simply trying to avoid evil at all costs. As soon as you identify evil, reject it, and then you won’t have to fear the Devil— that’s basically the simplest way to explain it. Even clandestine operations are never supposed to be evil. If there is a shred of evil in the secret agent’s actions and not entirely identified with the enemy, they should not resort to the betrayal and skullduggery of dark violence.
Secret agents need to be intelligent and masterful enough to identify another solution which is why children are not able to do so. They cannot possibly have the mastery required for that because of their age and limited life experience. Whoever the general, commander, or military leader should know the simplicity of good and evil well enough to approve when it clandestine operations are morally justified and never allow secret agents to act on their own authority outside the confines of an already assigned mission. That is why an enemy spy does not go around enemy territory killing anyone they think they can. They have specific targets, even if those targets are a group of people whom they are killing at opportunity. For example, consider the secret assassins of the Emperess in The Wheel of Time. They are the ones who infiltrate Tar Valon and attempt to assassinate their bitch queen or whatever she is called. They do not go into the city and kill regular citizens like the tavern owner, farmer, or haberdasher— they have a specific mission and it is not only limited in target, but in the fact that they will not return from it because of how treacherous that kind of objective is as a betrayal.
It is that mastery of spiritual professionalism and expertise that is required in reality, not fiction, which has resulted in the false idolatry of clandestine warriors through fiction, but that should never have happened. The mastery I am referring to is in fact so rare and unlikely that many people would not believe it possible as human potential because they’ve never had an occassion to witness it, nor a problem that would require it. In simpler words: they’ve not been in enough life-or-death situations and had to pull a rabbit out of their hat just to survive. That is not unusual, and you should not feel inadequate if that is the case, because society and civilization should be secure enough to not require that. Additionally, those situations are in fact life-or-death, and kill people in real life so most do not return from them to tell the tale. Do not foolishly seek such situations out of vanity or you are putting the odds against you, because moral relevance is vital to the outcome, mysterious as that may seem. That is another reason why spiritual and religious authority must never be disregarded in society.
In any case, you should never publicly praise such people as clandestine and secret agents, never honor them, and never respect them as warriors for others to see and know about to idolize. They are betrayers, no matter how you tell the story, and that is condemned no matter what. If they work in darkness, their glory is in darkness, and what happens in darkness is not intended to be seen. If it is good, then they should be making attempts to prevent that idolatry, and if it is evil, they are making attempts to hide their crimes. The USA government is doing the latter in that case: hiding the evil of their crimes that they are doing in secret, not hiding anything good, because the situation demands that it be revealed, and if they were good they would have no problem with that because they would be able to do so while wearing a mask, so to speak.
So, considering the betrayal that all clandestine and secret missions are: if their deeds merit redemption, then they are without punishment because that at most equivocates to the sin and balances the scale of justice, but if their deeds do not have great import of necessity that served the greater good, then they demand the punishment of betrayal no matter what, which is the most severe. That occurs in a public trial and the extent of their actions are investigated to determine the correct punishment according to the justice system and applicable laws, and there most certainly are applicable laws that were violated which is why they are even being secret in the first place.
Last thing— something like submarine operations, which are classified, require secrecy, and occur in darkness are not the same thing. That is because the beginning and end of the mission occurs in the light. The submarine, her crew, and the general purpose of the mission are known to the public, as well as the limitations of the mission’s objective. That is not a clandestine operation. That occurs in the light and is not a betrayal because the limitations are known and approved, so the details are within tolerance even if you do not know what they are. Those details need to be kept secret for obvious reasons and will be maintained in secret when the government’s clandestine operations are exposed for being evil. Apply this concept to determine which classifications need to be redacted and their contents made public.
End.