The expectations of lawmakers in a Free society

They have a higher standard of judgment and wisdom than any other form of government. That is the expectation.

Because slave nations like Israel, Iran, China, and all the others that are not free and think of their people as human slaves to support the regime of the polity, require the strictest obedience and oppression of their people to ensure they are as powerless and incapable as possible, they have the most severe laws. They fancy themselves superior because they have more laws that are stricter, but that is actually an indication that they are of poorer judgment and moral quality.

A Free nation is a nation that relies on reason, intelligent thought, and wisdom derived from human history as the fundamental strength of its society, and not government authority. Government authority is the least important, is most limited, and has the least respect of all forms of work in the USA. Military personnel are an exception because that is the most important use of the government. Not their commanders, the personnel who go out and fight. Those are the most important people in a Free nation because they sacrifice the freedom they can enjoy personally as a citizen doing what is in their best interest alone, to be of service to the greater good before themselves. Every other citizen is entitled in the good way to pursue what is in their best interest and only their best interest as a citizen in Free nation.

So, government lawmakers are expected, when making laws and governing social systems, to have a higher standard of wisdom and judgment than that of slave nations or Christian nations. Those nations are all inferior in moral requirement to that of Free nations because we trust people to have freedom, and they do not trust people to live their lives as they choose, with the exception of living as slaves. That does not mean we have more laws, it means we have less laws, but it means that those laws are enforced with better discernment so that more laws are not required.

There should never be a gray area that is abused in such a way as to require a law because of how wrong they are when they in fact know better, but are relying on the strictest interpretation of the law as their means of escaping justice. That is not how Freedom enforces the laws. There is a fundamental truth that the law protects, then if there is a problem where the law is not clear, the problem is considered in relation to that fundamental truth (life, liberty, and happiness), and that is what is enforced, not the words of the law. If those words were as important as the spirit, we would not have Freedom, but written doctrine is not as important as the spirit when it comes to Freedom.

So, social media companies working together to isolate, suppress, and prohibit certain expressions of speech that they find disagreeable to their private interests as though it were within their rights of a private company offering a public service to do so are criminal. Obviously that is against the fundamental truth of what is important in the USA and they are not allowed to do that. They probably bribed some people to write down that it was okay, and thought that would be fine, but it was never okay, and they will be prosecuted for such evil.

Another concept that is being grossly abused is the dating industry, where the owners of dating apps have been acting as though it is within their free rights to use those services to manipulate and control the dating outcomes of people according to their own interests, and not the public who they are providing a service to. That is the most obscene evil, and it should never have been tolerated even with approval given. The employees should have revolted and refused to do such a horrible evil to human beings with only one life to live.

That concept of providing a service to the public means that the interests that are protected are the public interests, not the private interests. Doing any sort of legal business in the USA is a service to the public, not private groups. That is why they were never legally justified to do what they have done. When we throw the rotten justices out on their asses, hopefully breaking a few hips, and then replace them with sensible lawmakers who understand law as it applies to our own government, not a slaving one like Christianity, those laws will be clarified and enforced to punish the people for what they have done under a false pretense of legality.

Additionally, because it was likely approved by the known traitor who committed high treason, all of those false legal claims that proved to be evil, destructive, and adhering to the enemiees of the USA, are voided, invalidated, and nulled. They cannot be accepted because the corruption of the traitor made them happen. If there were any acts of use that he wiped his slime on, those are going to have to be redrafted and reenacted as new acts, but cannot stand with the approval of a traitor of the worst kind. That is not a problem. It is the simplest solution and there should be no argument over doing that. Consider each and every one in relation to the fundamental truth of life, liberty, and happiness, and decide what to undo and what to redo.

That is all there is to it. Be glad Democracy is a government with so many people involved to make the work easy and manageable. It should never be consolidating at the president, and if it is, that is a sign of the most dangerous threat.