This is why the USA is lawless

Observe this quote from a legitimate “Terms of Use” fine print on a social networking website for public use of communication:

“These rights are revocable by us at any time in our sole discretion without advance notice or liability.”

What good are any rights if a company can simply specify that they can be revoked at any time, without any reason, and as though they never even existed? Those aren’t rights. Rights are specifically supposed to prevent those kinds of abuses from happening.

Thanks, DoubleList. I will be suing you for all that you own at the very least so you can explain why you thought such an illegal clause was even remotely appropriate in a user agreement.

The government says: “You have the right to free speech, religion, and press. These is your Bill of Rights protected by the Constitution of our government which we swear to uphold and defend so that you keep your rights. Except… if you don’t want to be Christian or circumcise then… the government also has the right to take away your rights to speech, relgion, and press. You won’t be able to talk to who you want, start a new faith without circumcising the faithful, or publish information for people. That would be contrary to the parasitic scheme that has infected the government to turn all of the government’s work toward the private interests of that parasitic group. Perfect. What the good Lord gives, the good Lord can take away no? And what are we, who bought the government with our bribes and criminal pawns if not the God of the USA since we have total power and authority over the government? Perfect.”

Just one problem there: our rights existed before the USA government and before any government existed. Our rights to free speech, religion, and press existed before civilization itself and were not created by you people who bought the government and control it as a the sole authority in conflict with the public interest. So how can you take away something that you did not even give in the first place? You cannot.

Of course… that is beating the dead horse becasuse your idiocy at attempting to triple stamp a double stamp isn’t fair play in a court of law. You can’t make a law and then say that law doesn’t apply when you don’t want it to. That’s not how laws work.

Let’s go ahead and take this to a court of law before a judge. You can tell the judge why you think what you did was legal, and I will tell the judge how you are hurting me, oppressing me, violating my rights, and are being illegal because of the rights I am supposed to have which were written earlier.

Then, we will let the judge decide in a formal court of law because that is why we have judges. People like you idiots who manipulate lawful intentions with evil and criminal acts do that kind of shit all the god damn time, and people like me, who are hurt by what you do, get mad and say, no, fuck you criminal scum and ungrateful heathen shit suckers! You cannot do that to me, and you are going to have to pay the consequences for doing so anyway. It’s true, you have free will, but you acting in defiance in that way is not going to protect you in a court of law or civilized society. You will be cast out if not put to death, because when we say you cannot do something and you prove that you can, the only thing you prove is that you cannot be trusted under any circumcstances whatsoever, because saying you cannot do something is not an imposition on your power to do it and everyone knows that. Why did you think you needed to do what everyone already knows is possible but has wholeheartedly rejected by accepting lawful civilization as a cooperative and universal interest of the greater good of all humanity?

You are not doing anything intelligent, proving any point, or doing anything helpful other than electing to be done away with by self-identifying as evil. Good riddance, and your reward will be to have everything taken away because what you think we cannot do because your rights protect, we most certainly can do since you proved that you can in fact do what the law forbids. That is self-evident by the law existing in the first place. There would be no law if we did not already know that people could do such evils and did not tolerate them. You think that just because you have some fragile, frail protection by the government now, you will be safe? We are going to make your life a living hell by casting you into hell, and proving to you that God does not tolerate evil, and especially doesn’t tolerate people who pretend they are God as though that were an excuse to do evil. Never have there been such stupid idiots as those who think they are wise by doing evil.

Listen you stupid Jew who is feigning innocent ignorance… “well it seemed like a bad idea at the time, but I didn’t know there anything to say I couldn’t do that, so I figured it was okay.” That is not going to work for you and do you know why? You have caused harm to other people. You have cost people their lives. Your actions have resulted in the deaths of human beings. You have cost people billions of dollars of assets that your foolishness was responsible for them losing. You will not be let off the hook for not knowing, even if you truly are innocent, which you aren’t, as I have proven. You should have known better and you claiming to not have known only adds to what you are guilty of, because you lied somewhere along the way about having a qualification that you do not have.

Why do I mention this? Do you remember the story of when I was a teen who used to take my truck off campus at lunch against the rules to eat at Heaven Dragon before the next class? One day, my hetero life-mate and I, who are eternally sworn by a pact we made in a game of tabletop Risk one weekend way back when, brought two girls with us at his invitation which I had no objections to. This is a sign of friendship, btw. He was imposing something on me which I was happy to accommodate. More specifically, my truck only had three seats in the cab. A single cab, and not a big one either. One maiden sat in the middle with her lovely maidenly blue-jean clad legs were delicately and properly beside the gear shit just close enough where I would brush against her when going into fifth. The other sat on his lap. The trick to this unconventional situation, was acknowledging the importance of safety.

“Just put the seat belt over both of you,” I said. “That ought to be safe enough, I reckon.”

We had lunch, fun time, and made our way back when lo and behold… lights and sirens, pull over your beat-up pick up truck now son, because I just know you are doing something you ought not to be and by golly, I’d feel guilty if I didn’t stop and check you for your sake.

Fast forward past the fruit snack gummy avalanche and exchange of valid paperwork.

“Just what in the hell were you thinking, son?”

“Honesly, officer, it seemed like a bad idea at the time, but I figured with the seat belts we’d be alright since it was just a short trip to Heaven Dragon and back.”

Shaking his head, “I’m going to give you warning for now, but you just keep in mind that one seat belt is for one person from now on. Now get out of here before you are late for class.”

What is the difference between that kind of innocent ignorance and the kind where someone is attempting to take away someone’s inalienable rights, causing immense suffering, causing death, economic disaster, and injury with crimes against humanity?

It may not be obvious what the difference is, so I will tell you: the difference is the knowledge of good and evil that is universal to all humanity. Every individual has this knowledge and every individual trusts each other to have that knowledge. Had the imposition of the extra passenger been “evil” regardless of the legality, my conscience would have thought, not only does this seem like a bad idea, but this feels wrong and I won’t allow that to happen. Everyone in that situation would have had the power to prevent it individually had there been evil, which obviously there wasn’t. Against the law, technically, but not everything the law dictates is a matter of good and evil. Additionally, so too did the officer have a moment of judgment. His “spidey senses” were tingling when he stopped us, and god bless the man, those are what we trust law enforcement officers to protect us with. When he looked to identify what triggered the alarm of his better judgment as an officer of the law, he had the opportunity to decide whether what we had done was evil or not, and had authority to dispense justice as a legal officer. The very signal of the alarm is a cause for action, but is not always a cause for punishment, and thus a warning is what was judged most appropriate, which is mercy, not wrath, and both mercy and wrath are justice.

What might have the officer looked at which I had not been aware of as a 16 year old boy? The expressions of the passengers? The expression of myself, the driver. The vehicle, the story I told about what happened, and the scene we were all in with knowledge about events in the local community I likely had no awareness of. Events that officers are briefed on each day before they go on the beat. Awareness of a whole criminal underworld in our midst that every officer has a part in, even if they are not directly tasked with taking force to the threat.

Who knows? I just didn’t want to get a ticket because then my parents would find out when the insurance sky rocketed and I’d be grounded, and that would suck. I want to go out with my friends on the weekend, and if a warning is all that I deserve, then so be it, I will take that gratefully and be on my way like the good Catholic boy I am.

What good does that warning serve? Who all may have been terrified about the prospect of trouble with the law? Did you not know that my hetero life-mate is one of the rich folk, city boys with all the privilege and good stuff? Blonde hair, blue eyes, and two pretty girls from the same kind of high class caliber munitions? How much more do they have to risk from their parents than a poor kid like me who lives on bologna and cheap stuff? Maybe that interaction between the law officer and me was just the kind of thing those two girls needed to see to grow up knowing they were safe in this world. Do you see how a single account of true events can serve a timeless purpose of wisdom beyond the people involved?

I couldn’t tell you what any of that means or what the other people were thinking, only that I was looking to get some good food at Heaven Dragon served by a good friend who is the first man to ever kiss me in that sacred football locker room of only the bravest and most courageous of young warriors. On the top of my head for Christ’s sake! You damn weirdos. I shant tell you anymore of kissing in the locker room, because that is a fantasy I will indulge in private with the select individual involved and very nearly was caught with by the head coach when he entered the equipment room suddenly. Speaking of… I maybe ought to send a message…

What was I saying before teen kissing became the subject?

….

The last thing you want to do is pretend like you don’t know the difference between good and evil, because that is what makes you human and everyone knows that much. The only difference is whether or not can explain what you know, but that isn’t necessary for everyone to understand what is good or evil.

If you think you are fighting a war and need to do whatever it takes to “win” then you need to reconsider your position. The only time “whatever it takes” is necessary is when survival is trule at stake, which means your body, flesh and blood, is in danger. That is not your bodily identity, that is your body without an identity other than human, which can say “I am” about our identity. That is as far as a survival concern for human beings go. So, if you think you need “power”, “weapons”, or “strength” to defeat your enemies and are sacrificing moral integrity and ethical restraint to obtain that power, you have already destroyed yourself, because you have no justification to be fighting anymore. The human fight is not one we engage each other with violence to win. It is a fight we engage each other with communication, and why rights to speech, religion, and press are so important to be protected.

Even a communist government should protect those rights. The only difference between a communist government and a democratic one is how society and civilization organizes, which is a preferential concern, not a vital concern. People should be able to talk about what they want, believe what they want, and express what they want publicly, without the government being in danger. Communism can continue to exist as long as they adhere to their doctrine of law and provide exceptions when necessary. Providing those exceptions is not a contradiction or conflict if you specify that an exception is being granted for whatever reason, such as exceptional merit, talent, ability, or circumstances. A democracy should be able to allow businesses and private groups the full freedom of their lives as long as the government adheres to the doctrine of their law and grants exceptions when necessary. None of that should be secret because government is entirely a public concern and has no private interest.

Ask yourself why you need power. Is it truly because you want to protect something good, or is it because you hate something good?

You will never win a war against humanity if you think that violence and brute force will be the final Word to judge the outcome. Instead, reject violence and brute force as much as possible and strive toward reason, dialogue, and diplomacy— none of which will be of any use as long as they occur in secret. Reason, dialogue, and diplomacy are effective because those are actions that the entire public body can participate in within the local communities. If you do not demonstrate that with a government to the world public, then no part of the world’s public will be able to do what is necessary to resolve the problem. Problems like that are so vast and complicated they affect each and every individual life, and you cannot hope to resolve them with a secret, elite team trying to manipulate the lives of everyone else.