Amplifying information
Regarding the rules of context and the rules of fair play as they apply to virtual simulations of reality however realistic, symbolic, or abstract they may be, my definitions should be expanded upon, further examined, and improved.* I think more can be said by other people and be of more benefit and clarity. However, when the Way of the Story becomes a formal religion, it will be available to provide its authoritative position on the subject as a reference for others to do what they will with. It’s not going to be perfect for everyone, but that’s not the point. Things like that are best used like triangulation in mathematics for discerning location and value as it applies to a relative point of perspective.
That same concept is how I recommend others conceptualize the religious purpose of the current events as it pertains to them now or in the future as individuals. In other words, if you find yourself asking this question: “Who is Nick Bylotas, why is he significant as relative to Jesus the Christ, if at all, and what does that mean for me?”
Consider what you know of the place, time, and context of my own personal identity and what you know of the place, time, and context of Jesus the Christ’s personal identity and being. Then consider the concept I explain as the “highest divine” and Jesus is recorded to express as “the Father” as it exists relative to your understanding of space, time, and context (all together that is what I mean with the capital word “Story”). As you consider those three things in light of yourself, and I literally mean light, you may find the answer to that question, and if you need help there will be people who can help you everywhere. Christians, Jews, Muslims, local shaman, Buddhists, a good friend you know and trust as wise, parents, mentors, etc. and you shouldn’t be ashamed to ask for help or other opinions because all of us are interconnected in purpose and meaning as an eternal mystery.
The other thing is about the people interfering with my gameplay in video games I play. Neither you understand what I am attempting to communicate, nor do I understand you are attempting to communicate, but I am correct in my position, and here is why: I don’t know who you are, how you know me, what you want, or why I should care. I do know that you are a nuisance I find to be disrespectful to what I find most important. There is no way I could know that, nor should you be trying to communicate me with such offensive means as though you expected me to interpret signs and symbols like you are a false pagan deity, which I do not worship or acknowledge because there are none in my culture that are relevant enough for me to recognize in such a random obscure way.
In terms of spiritual signs and symbols you people appear quite literally as the forms of demons, devils, and minions of Hell, and I am even less inclined to trust you or respect your presence because you don’t announce yourself as a being of Hell worthy of my respect would do. Even if you were a total stranger I am unfamiliar with. Also, I am not in any such organizations or groups that I would expect such communication from as though it were coded and veiled for secrecy for a purpose I agreed with.
In short, if you have something to say, say it in person, even if it is only your signature on a document.
That is why I don’t understand you because this has gone on for far too long to be innocent, and something must be wrong. That presence is the only lead I have to find out what it is.
That is what you don’t understand about me, because you don’t yet grasp the gravity of the situation you are in. I am going to trace that lead, by myself if necessary, hopefully with other professionals helping, get to the source, and resolve the problem, whatever that may be.
Figure out for yourself what needs to be done for yourself.
*RPG video games and football for example of realistic and abstract — do not sexualize these concepts! They exist specifically because they are not about sexuality and we don’t want that social energy of collective consciousness, in Jungian terms, expressed as sexuality because it is least productive to everyone including the people doing the expression if done that way. There is a time and place for community sexual expression as good and fine and normal, but that is usually underground, hidden, and veiled in occult mystery as it should be. In general, the passions of men and women are better suited being applied to other goods that sexual pleasure, which is in fact a good however you may experience it, to include anal intercourse. In regard to sexualizing higher concepts of reality, avoid it, please, and as much as possible. The last thing we want are common non-sexual expressions being used to apply to sexual concepts when we want to have a normal conversation in public. Just a suggestion. Freudian psychology has limits to the degree sexual metaphor can be expressed as far as I know, those are to the unconscious and subconscious personality as it manifests in dreams, personal myth, and symbols that are significant to the life of the patient. You shouldn’t be asserting a claim about understanding the sexual libido of other people unless you are a professional. It is a personal concept, delicate, and sensitive. It is okay to idly theorize, converse about, casually comment on or imply with wit, but you don’t want to pretend like you know what you are talking about regarding the life of a person unless you do in a professional context or you will likely cause great offense. It’s one thing to recognize phallic symbols and effeminate behavior, and another to make a statement about what that means in regard to the sexual libido of an individual who has not confided personal details about their life to you as a patient does confidentially with their doctor. Even if they did, you would be obligated to maintain confidentiality or you could lose your license. Besides, it doesn’t matter how effeminate a male may be socially or romantically with other men, their actions, their words, their life may reflect true masculinity as it applies in the high context with qualities like honor and reliability to the community.