Role of Politicians in the USA

The president, the senators, the representatives, and all the other elected and appointed officials that are employed to operate and maintain the United States government do not represent the people.

I shall write that again for emphasis: they do not represent the people.

They represent the government. All the people have a shared interest in the government which they invest, but that is only a fragment of each citizen’s interests. The people represent ourselves. We have our own lives, interests, and goals which are ours alone and if we don’t share those with anyone else and they don’t concern anyone else, then nobody else needs to know what those are, least of all the government.

One, I would not trust my body to anyone else without a purpose I know and who did not equally have as much to lose. That is why I will not allow a dentist to perform a root canal. I am not going to trust my body for them to operate on if I cannot sue them if something goes wrong. Their profession, career, and work is vital to their body as it funds their basic needs and wants, so a law suit is a threat to their body as well, but in a different way than a drill in the gums. Neither is life threatening, but the drill in the gums is far worse than any lawsuit in my opinion.

I would never trust my body to the president to have the best interests in mind. That is not freedom, not free will, and it is plain stupid because nobody else knows my body like I do.

So, that is why a politician cannot represent the people directly unless they have a power of attorney signed by the individual they are representing because they were designated as such. Politicians, elected officials, and government agents do not have power of attorney for citizens. They cannot make decisions that require our own personal authority unless that has been legally granted in a formal document that designates the limits and reach of that power of attorney.

The represent the government and the government has a specific purpose assigned to maintain the role it has in protecting the common interests of the people as they pertain to government. That does not include religious faith, morality, entertainment, socializing, and certainly not romantic interests. Those are of no concern to the government, and it not only does not have the authority to meddle in those things, but it is explicitly prohibited from doing so because of how much people hate it when they do in addition to their total inability to do so in any useful way.

Laws don’t exist to establish morality and maintain morality. Laws exist to maintain order and ensure prosperity. Religions exist to establish morality and maintain morality, and religions and free to develop and practice as they so desire as long as they are in accordance with the shared interests of all people including themselves. Those shared interests are never without their own personal individual interests in part. They are among the people and those interests are shared equally, so a person is never excluded.

There is no reason to be upset that all of your interests are represented by the government for two reasons: you do not want that because the government does not know you as a person and cannot know you as a person, and there is no possible way it can be able to know your best interests. The other is that if all of your best interests were represented it would not incude everyone’s interests, and that shared investment is the social agreement that maintains national security.

If the government has any interest that is in conflict with my inalienable rights then I have no interest in the government and I will not contribute to the security of those who are opposed to my life. The national security falls apart because people are not willing to go to war to defend their enemies or contribute taxes that benefit their enemies only. It’s obvious why people are not only unwilling to contribute to a hostile government, but are in open rebellion against a hostile government.

The reason this system can be maintained is because of those universal rights that are explicitly recognized and identified as belonging inherently and innately to all human beings. Those are the inalienable writes at that which the writing of our founding documents strives to express the spirit of. The government’s sole purpose is to ensure the protection of those universal rights, which are constantly under threat by Jews, Muslims, and Christians who desire slavery of the flesh. Christianity is supposed to be opposed to that according to its scripture, but in practice they are not and are among the most lawless and malevolent servants of evil.

So, any decision a government makes needs to held to the standard of the inalienable rights they are charged with protecting. Additionally, because those inalienable rights are universal, the government cannot deny them of foreigners in other nations by unjust and inhospitable government decisions. If you reject the right to life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness of others as though their loss of those rights were the cost of providing them within the borders, the rights of the citizens are forfeited too. They are no longer universal to the government at that point and thus the government is no longer necessary and is in fact a threat to all human life because it is not a human life and is opposed to our interests. It does not eat, it does not enjoy pleasure, it does not fall in love, it does not feel anything bodily because it has no body, and the government has no concept of humanity and what is important to us.

The government is restrained in the limits of enforcing power over people in two ways: the greater limit is at the recognized border of the USA. Within those boundaries it has greatest authority to enforce laws that govern the shared interests of the citizens. Beyond those borders it is restrained to the most limited means of involving itself. It has no power to enforce another nation’s laws or maintain interests that are not universally shared. It can however express itself without limit through the people who represent the government, and that is all that it can do to affect what is out of its reach.

If there is a grave crime against humanity the nation can intervene as a bystander. However, that cannot be done in secret because that defeats the entire purpose of a bystander intervention! If a bystander intervenes they need to make clear what they believe is right and wrong, and if they cannot stop it with their words alone, they need to inform the authorites as soon as possible. The authorities in this case are the people who have limited the government from accessing their power in fullness, and the other nations who also have people with the same equality as the USA citizens have with each other.

Then the people will decide if war is necessary, not the government. The government will recognize the will of the people as it is expressed in public, repeat back what they recognize to ensure they didn’t get it wrong, and then do what is in everyone’s shared interest in full understanding of how and why, and able to explain each action they take as how it is applicable to the shared interest.

Do not try to organize and control the public beyond that of the government itself. That negates all freedom first of all, but it is also impossible and without purpose due to the inefficiency of such control. Instead create nodes where the public can freely visit to contribute their ideas, opinions, and reasons. Ensure all people have access to those nodes with the most ease possible, and there is no discrimination. People may express things outside of those nodes and those too are valid expressions, but having nodes like that is about as organized as it can possibly be, which is considerable. Most people do not want to involve themelves in government affairs at all and will not do so unless it is their direct purpose. That’s because the government has the least of our interests as its only concern.

Next thing: Jews and Muslims. Those two groups exclude themselves from the inclusion of everyone else. That is the entire purpose they exist. They wanted to be excluded from everyone and created all manner of reasons to do so, many of which are treacherous, evil, violent, and unsavory. They will kill you rather than be united as your equal. So, if we respect the universal rights, then we reject them because they respect universal rights and put themselves in opposition to those rights as the sworn enemy of equality, humanity, freedom, and life.

They can be allowed to stay in our borders, but only with greater restrictions because of their publicly known faith and doctrine that is pure hostility to everyone else. By simply calling themselves “Jew” or “Muslim” they self identify that they are the enemy of everyone else and will stop at nothing to destroy everyone.

Obviously they are simply deluded imbeciles of savage culture and beliefs that have not developed intellectually at the same pace as everyone else. So we pity them as people, and offer them no sympathy as Jews or Muslims. That’s why they are restricted in their rights. They mutilate infants with no concern for life, happiness, love, or anything sacred and then claim they can do so without needing to explain why. That kind of diseased mind is highly threatening to everyone else because they have no inhibitions against violence, crime, and evil. Thus they need restrictions and quarantine until they are able to learn the lessons of basic human history.

The USA government cannot accomodate Jews and Muslims in any way except to exclude them from the shared interests of humanity, which is their sole desire anyway. They are unbelievably stupid and selfish, yes. They are evil, hostile, and hateful too. However, that is simply the risk of human nature. Free will can be used to be evil and because free will is so powerful of a quality, their choice to be evil makes them a concerning threat that needs to be acknowledged for the what it is.

You may not like denying them everything, but humanity, science, and general common knowledge are far beyond the state of Jews and Muslims and we understand their situation as I have just explained. They cannot explain themselves nor our position and thus are the losing party in any sort of reasonable argument. Eventually, they should learn how stupid it is to exclude themselves from humanity because they depend entirely on everyone else, and cannot survive otherwise. When that happens, they will be most willing to identify as human beings instead of something lesser simply to have food to eat and water to drink. When that happens they will realize what everyone else does and rebuke Judaism and Islam for a better life.

Until that happens, do not extend any of government services and power to them. Do not trade, do not offer military, do not offer humanitarian relief. Do nothing. That is highly unpleasant, but it is the best solution. They are counting on humans not being willing to be so uncharitable as their sole advantage and means of remaining parasitic because they are even more uncharitable. The government is not a person though, and this should not be a concern because it does not feel human needs. People can help if they wish, but the government cannot involve itself, meaning the people who operate and maintain the government cannot involve themselves while under oath.

Fuck off.