Better use of thumb for reading effectively

Now that thine thumb has been removeth from thine arsehole, not only wilt thou not bloat excessive with gaseous crapstench, but may use the opposing digit for various apples.

In regard to reading, separate preconceived notions of the author from the work.

This is not for the author’s benefit, but for yours, because of what writing makes possible by transcending the human body to higher planes. If you are associating the written words as inseperable from the identity of the body writing them, you are doing a disservice to yourself by ignoring the higher cause for their authoring.

Things like personal bias, personal opinion, and flaws of character the person doing the writing may have. If those are not present in the words being written, do not imagine they are there. Written words convey a more finite existence than that of the human being, meaning you will not find divinity within them ever, only the way to divinity. Let that be a lesson on how to interpret all law, doctrine, and rules of government.

That is in fact what makes writing so effective because you can convey specific quantities of self without conveying the entirety of a person, which would include all of those flaws, undesirable traits, and bias. The words and work a person creates is separate from that person, and you should never mistake the two as the same, otherwise you will be judging them as though you are divine authority when you most certainly are not. That is a problem for you, because the result of a fool making such judgments is that they hit the intended target, but because they are unjustified, the intended target becomes justified and returns them to the original fool, who then cannot possible meet the standards because of the sin of arrogance that caused them to judge another person in the first place.

As you can see, the personal facts of a person’s life and character do not actually matter at all in this exchange. There is no need to compare life record, but even if you did, the sin of judging another person in such a way to provoke such comparison is worse than anything else a person can do. If they do that, they claim responsibility not only for their own sins, but the sins they perceive in others, and all sins of all people who have ever sinned. They become the origin of sin, and all murderers, rapists, thieves, and criminals of all kind can blame their sin on that person who judges others as though he knew sin above all others as the creator of it. Nothing good created sin, meaning the author of all creation did not create sin, but what was created and trusted by that author to create on their own are the origin and cause of sin. You should never blame the highest divine for sin or the cause of sin.

It is as the stories tell of a being in the role of servant being so prideful and puffed up with the privilege they were entitled in the service of the almighty thinking they could usurp the almighty with the power they were trusted, but did not even begin to understand that power as the almighty to whom it belongs. Thus they were cast out of paradise and became the scourge of all existence and the origin of evil. If you judge others sins in such a way as to reject their human spirit or work because of some mysterious thing you think you know of their body, you only do so by claiming you were that origin of evil and then incriminate yourself. That is not a popular image like people want to pretend in media of the modern age. That is most despised, hated, and rightfully cast out if not cast in— to the fire and reduced to ash.

So, when you read words like these, try not create obstacles of yourself by imagining my person with all manner of sin you want to put in my person whether it is there or not already. That is not your business nor your place to know and judge, and it will be when the time comes. If you have a genuine concern then you need to do address it in human and civil ways that confront the person directly, first asking them to reveal what you suspect, explaining why you suspect it, and then if still not satisfied prove to the enforcers of law you have a reason to force an investigation.

H.P. Lovecraft is a well loved author of popular and imaginative horror. However, some people have claimed he was “racist” or some other foolishness as if they know the man personally. Just because he wrote something that he thinks does not mean that is the way he acts with his body in real life. There are no crimes in thinking, even if your thoughts conclude on something as undesirable as racism. There are reasons for why people think that which you do not know. Reasons that have to do with personal encounters in real life, and spiritual encounters with humans and spirits in real life. All that can influence what a person thinks and why because of the information they receive from outside sources.

What is important is not what a person thinks, but how they live, act, and behave in real life. It is true I am as anti-semitic as a man can be, and some people seem to think that is a loathesome quality of evil as though I were Hitler himself! Both I and Hitler would be offended by the comparison because I would never act in such as way as Hitler would, and he would never have wanted to associate as the same as a Gentile because of how devoted he was to the circumcised claim. Just because I hate Jews and Jewish culture does not mean I would be rude or unkind to Jews in person should I meet them. Unless of course they give me a reason to be, in which case I will not hold back with my rebuke and will be so rude as to possibly leave a mortal wound upon their heart with the severity of insults I can summon.

Consider what the words say and what the argument is and do not mistake them for the man.

The rule of thumb is this: read as though you do not know anything of the author, but if you read and find that you can identify the author through them, know that the image of person you think you understand the author to be is in fact a reflection of yourself, not the author. There may be mutual qualities both you and the author share, but the person you are seeing is your own, and it may not be what you like, which is most likely why the author is conveying it. So you can see that about yourself and correct it.

If you have a glorious and manly mustache that drives maidens all throughout the multiverse into the heat of desire and passion for romance and lovemaking like myself, but unfortunately and unbeknownst to you, there was also a green, slimy booger residing there from your last use of tissue. You would want to know about it so you could remove it before more people see and are grossed out of your presence without ever being able to enjoy the pleasures of your company because of the undesirable booger that was unavoidably noticeable and preventing any enjoyment. It is kind of like having a Jew assigned via the cybertechnology to unlawfully trafficking all communication a person sends while manipulating and redirecting it to different recipients in opposition of the sender’s interests, all for the purpose of attempting to control that person’s life like it was your own, which is the most uncharitable, selfish, and evil thing a person can do.

Like I said before, there is no greater good than the individual human being, and when a person attempts to manipulate, control, and make decisions for a human being as though they were their own person, they attempt to murder that person and replace them with themselves. It does not ever work and only ends in the destruction, certainly for the person attempting to do so, but also possibly for all other people affected by their target. To do onto others as though they were yourself is not to disregard that they are not yourself. That should be obvious because it is implied as the state of perception before considering how they may feel about what you are doing to them, not how you feel about it or think you are going to like about what you do to them.