Unethical Science
Quite possibly the stupidest, least capable, least intelligent, and most destructive to human and technological progress are the unethical scientists. Primarily because they fancy themselves intelligent and like to show off their certificates and job titles and go to the fancy secret meetings, but do not realize the error of their ways or the consequences their actions have beyond the limited scope of their hubris. They perceive reality as a science experiment from their own perspective, and thus fail to account for factors, information, and variables that are outside of what they believe to be possible. Ironically, what they believe about science to have any and all possibility, they entirely disregard faith as having no value, no possible good, nor any use at all, and entirely disregard faith as though all of humanity before them have been fools to have ever spoken of faith and insisted on the importance of faith in daily lives. How more arrogant can you be to think that all previous generations of humans are total fools in comparison to yourself?
Why then is faith relevant? Because of faith applications to moral judgment, and moral judgment in relation to ethical professional decisions. Always I sense at this juncture their lack of imagination and ignorance which equates all morality with archaic Judaism, Christianity, or known doctrines. How could they be so stupid as to think something like morality was confined to what people have written about morality? Why do they not realize that what is morally significant transcends what can be known, and if they limit their understanding of morality to known variables, they will never have enough information to make an informed decision. To not know a variable does not mean that nothing can be known about that variable, for although the variable specifics are unknown, the affect of that variable on reality is often knowable. Without knowing what the highest divine is, you can know that doing good results in good, and doing evil results in evil. If there is ever any confusion there, it is not in the nature of reality but in the knowledge of good and evil that the person has.
My point is, that the unethical pursuit of science has consequences far greater than any possible perceived benefit could make up for. Their use of unethical means and research will never be worth the results they have, not for them, not for others, not for anyone, not ever. They will have only made life worse, regressed civilization, and wasted their time. The use unethical science in general damages society, humanity, and civilization far more than the unethical means themselves. So, even though the people and animals they abuse and put in danger for their science suffer immensely, all of society is jeopardized by the lack of trust people have in science and those who fund science. Thus they insist on secrecy, but that always fails, someone escapes, the word gets out, and then they do more and more evil to continue being able to hide their evil. It is such a fruitless and pointless endeavor that it is curious to know how such people were ever able to graduate grade school, let alone collegiate level education.
Thus, there is one solution I have to this problem, because it is quite obvious that the USA is employing unethical scientists to do all manner of evil experiments of human beings for no purpose other than to satisfy their perverse and sadistic curiosity. All science courses, from grade school to the doctorate level need to be equally taught with ethical philosophy that includes the study of theology. No particular religious theology is necessary, but they do need to study why theology derives morality the way they do. It seems they often dismiss there being any reason for moral law in religious doctrine, but that only reveals the limits of their understanding and obscene ignorance. Theology is not an arbitrary system of beliefs based on whims and fancy. It is a logical system of reasons that are derived from non-physical truths.
If they understand the implications of morality on human behavior, and the importance of science as an attribute of human expression and power, they should be able to recognize the colossal mistake that using unethical science is. They should be able to see that even though they are uncovering various obscure facts with their evil experimentations, the culmination of those facts is useless and irrelevant to their goals.
Why are there so many unethical scientists in the world? I’m sure you can deduce the reason, which causes them to have no respect for human life nor any self-respect for their profession.
Power is not realized by expressing power, but with restraint. You do not achieve a powerful goal if the goal is power, even if that power is restrained, controlled, or contained. You can only achieve a powerful goal if the end result is entirely about restraint so that power does not need to be expressed, controlled, or used at all. The greatest power is that which is least and does most; an artist with a pen who subjugates all nations, not a tyrant with a weapon who will not be able to survive an insult. I appear to be so powerful as a man, not because I am strong, but because they are weak. Rather than looking into my life for what makes me great, their research would be better served dissecting Trump to identify what makes him weak, vulnerable, and impotent.
If you want a secret military weapon of ultimate mystical destruction, you do not need to use evil, you only need to know what makes evil vulnerable and powerless. What makes men like Trump so helpless, pathetic, and weak in comparison to me? Why am I such a threat to everyone through him? Why is his destruction so threatening to all of your lives that you feel the need to protect him? What is it you need to protect, and what makes you think you have the strength or ability to reinforce such colossal weakness? Identify that about Trump, and you will know how to defeat any enemy of any nation no matter how powerful they are, but that is the only weapon you will find, because what makes them vulnerable to good is also what makes me invulnerable to evil.
That would be ethical research because Trump is a criminal, domestic terrorist, and the worst kind of traitor. Humanity, law enforcement, and civilization are all justified to investigate the lives of criminals. I am not a criminal you have no justification whatsoever to be investigating my life with such invasive methods of futility since there are no crimes or sins to be found that will reveal vulnerabilities. You can certainly do that to Trump without any guilt, remorse, and achieve the results you are failing to achieve by assaulting me, since you have no scientific or legal authority to be taking actions against me as though I were guilty of crimes and sins I am not. In fact, you are only giving yourselves vulnerabilities and threatening your own lives by attacking me because you are causing yourselves to do crime, commit sin, and incur guilt which is subject to an investigation that is justified as well. It is only a matter of time before that happens, and when it does, will be more thorough than you could do to me.