The Paradox of Contradictions (in shorthand)
Shorthand because want to play video games. Thus, not seamless bridge; stepping stones. Try not to slip.
First the subject.
While engaging operation number 2, divine thought occurred concerning limits of reason applied as flesh. Then, situationally, epiphany: op. #2 + divine thought. Good metaphor.
Consider the Christ, Jesus, once more. Reason dictates he is Word made flesh according to logical doctrine of Hebrew theology transforming into universal doctrine of theology of all peoples. Basic concept of death—satisfy sin of exclusive elitism as an indication of evil, separation, not-diversity, unnatural, irrelevant, and misleading modification. Not necessarily sin, but effectively sin. Jesus Christ = conceptually perfect man, no sin, all good. Death on cross = presence of sin in his body as paragon Jew. Good with Gentiles, true to Jews, but still exclusive in acceptance resulting in denial, inequality, suffering, and disturbance in community.
However true the reason and logic of Word made flesh is = it contradicts truth of his being as good. Conclusion: flowpath of reason is this top down: divine order most wise -> celestial beings angelic language -> saints (spiritual human persons as divine beings after death)-> phase shift—> mortal human being. The phase shift is when spirit becomes flesh. Truth becomes human reason. Effectively an inversion. Therefore Word as flesh conceptually true in spiritual language. As close as possible to living embodiment as man, it inverts and thus is no longer true. Missing piece: higher understanding, wisdom from the future.
Point: perfect reason is not excuse to do evil or deny flesh reality of beings. Phase shift missing piece: future understanding prevents total conceptualization of truth in flesh reality. Still true as Word made flesh, but not requiring death and redemption, requiring understanding, wisdom, acceptance. Future understanding and wisdom conceivable in present via frontal cortex. Precognition. Requires perception of higher conceptual reality as interface to use.
For future use: Circumstance of perfect reason suggesting action in contradiction of norms, expectations, known standards; doing what is known and necessary good, but also indicated as prohibited (misnomer “necessary evil” - NOT EVIL) Phase shift of spiritual truth to human reason requires future consideration of results as integral to contradiction. Never excluded. Always discerned clearly and identified first, results may vary, modify as applicable toward discerned future result avoiding any further contradiction. Only one is necessary, not hidden, and more disrupt the balance of logic. With unforseen consequences, do not add contradictions. Never do that. Two wrongs do not make a right. One wrong does not make a right, but one wrong can be made right with one redress. Two wrongs compound the dilemma making moral satisfaction unobtainable without further unforeseen consequences, negating value of the initial discerned good as future purpose before initial contradiction.
Further reason for never two wrongs: imagine first wrong… actions according to plan, results as expected, suddenly deviation (anticipate this), judgment parity, decision. If judgement good, decision wise, correct, good, resolution continues uninhibited without further complications even with more unexpected deviations. If judgement not good, deviation from wrong responded to with wrong makes wrong sandwiches. All meat inside corrupt. In previous words, parts within “actions according to plan, results as expected” become wrongs in need of redress. More problems. Not efficient, Devil grins and makes profit while humans incur debt.
Ideal result (undesirable situation): paradox contradiction requiring wrong: ~deal with Devil for necessary mutual interest both Devil’s and humans (mutuality limited), wrong done as known good, no further wrongs done, situation returns to normal fubar (snafu) and continue as planned steady progress, not too fast, not too slow, walking with purpose and haste, not running in an emergency*. Effectively: breaking even with the gamble. Never gamble with life. Never risk good in a gamble unless absolutely no other choice. If other choices available, risking good always loses. If truly no other options, risking good always wins, because miracle of truth.
Respectfully request further analysis and clarification.
*Moral dilemma too confined and complex, running too reckless, unsafe. Not slow and methodical; purposefully, intentionally, as trained without delay, without uncertainty, and with haste. Yes, haste. Get the SCBA recharge ready as fast as possible but do not rush, haste is slower than rush. Haste is comfortably fast, varies by experience. enough.
Something else during op. 2. Forgot. Maybe later. Ah yes: example is butt fucking and homosexuals. paradox contradiction. Spiritual reason of perfect truth indicates male and female reproduction as high spiritual concepts, thus epitome of union resulting in concept: sanctity of marriage (non-antagonistic, logic), (however) phase shift, human beings in real life. Missing piece and phase shift. Male and female marriage in real life equals union of flesh and blood bodies as physical forms, other divine reason on subject indicates flesh irrelevant for spiritual transcendence of human souls. That is the missing piece that belongs to phase shift of sanctity of marriage, justifying same sex marriages.
*relevant to Catholic doctrinal reason provided by Pope John Paul. —Physical exchange of bodily reproduction for new life not necessary for full giving of self to spouses to each other via true love without restraint for new life. Difference, no procreation. That’s okay. Some births fail. Not a sin. Procreation not necessary because it is flesh. What is necessary is full giving of self for sanctity to remain during sexual intercourse within marriage. Example, Jesus on cross. Bodily death irrelevant. Sole relevance is full giving of self as mercy and charity even unto death. Further implications: doctrinally okay for all forms of sexual expression in marriage and the use of contraception. Flesh creation not necessary for sanctity. Proof: Abram and Sara. Example: adoption is high good.
Inform Pope and cardinals of relevant to Catholic doctrine part and get crackin’. No time to lose, plus… aren’t you bored!? Let’s flip this thing already and actually do something for a change.